Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Return of Plaint for Non-Compliance of Section 80 CPC. Court holds that once notice under Section 80 CPC is waived, the suit cannot be returned for compliance of the same provision.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: KOLHAPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 130
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners filed Regular Civil Suit No.335/2021 seeking permanent injunction against alienation of suit property. They also filed an application for waiver of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking urgent relief. The Civil Judge Senior Division, Satara allowed the waiver application on 02.09.2021. However, later on 04.10.2021, the same court passed an order returning the plaint for compliance of Section 80 CPC, effectively ignoring its earlier waiver order. The petitioners challenged this order before the Bombay High Court. The High Court observed that once the court had exercised its discretion under the proviso to Section 80(1) CPC and waived notice, it could not subsequently order return of plaint for compliance of the same provision. The court held that the order of waiver is final and cannot be reviewed or reconsidered. The impugned order was therefore illegal and set aside. The writ petition was allowed, and the Civil Judge was directed to proceed with the suit in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Section 80 CPC - Waiver of Notice - Once the court exercises discretion under Section 80(1) proviso and waives notice, it cannot later order return of plaint for compliance of the same provision - The order of waiver is final and cannot be reviewed or reconsidered - Held that the impugned order returning plaint is illegal and set aside (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Civil Judge could order return of plaint for compliance of Section 80 CPC after having already waived the notice under the same provision.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Impugned order dated 04.10.2021 passed by Civil Judge Senior Division, Satara below Exhibit-5 in Regular Civil Suit No.335/2021 is set aside. The Civil Judge is directed to proceed with the suit in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Section 80 CPC waiver is final
  • once granted cannot be reviewed
  • return of plaint after waiver is illegal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (11) 210

Writ Petition No.7414 of 2021 with Interim Application (Stamp) No.20728 of 2021

2025-11-24

S. G. Chapalgaonkar, J.

Mr. Manmath Athalye for Petitioners, Mr. Nikhil Wadikar i/by Mr. Nandu Pawar for Respondent No.1

Snehankita Pankaj Pawar and Pankaj Ashok Pawar

Shirkant Shivaji Todkar, Ld. Regional Officer MIDC, Ld. Area Manager MIDC

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit seeking permanent injunction

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to set aside order returning plaint for compliance of Section 80 CPC

Filing Reason

Civil Judge ordered return of plaint despite having earlier waived notice under Section 80 CPC

Previous Decisions

Civil Judge allowed waiver application on 02.09.2021, but later on 04.10.2021 ordered return of plaint for compliance of Section 80 CPC

Issues

Whether the Civil Judge could order return of plaint for compliance of Section 80 CPC after having waived notice under the same provision.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that once waiver is granted, the suit cannot be returned for compliance of Section 80 CPC.

Ratio Decidendi

Once the court exercises discretion under the proviso to Section 80(1) CPC and waives notice, it cannot later order return of plaint for compliance of the same provision. The order of waiver is final and cannot be reviewed or reconsidered.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners impugns order dated 04.10.2021, passed by Civil Judge Senior Division, Satara below Exhibit-5 in Regular Civil Suit No.335/2021, by which return of plaint has been ordered for compliance of provisions under Section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure. The Civil Judge Senior Division, Satara allowed petitioners’ application vide order dated 02.09.2021 and waived notice under Section 80 of CPC. Once the court has exercised discretion under the proviso to Section 80(1) CPC and waived notice, it cannot subsequently order return of plaint for compliance of the same provision.

Procedural History

Petitioners filed Regular Civil Suit No.335/2021 seeking permanent injunction. They applied for waiver of notice under Section 80 CPC, which was allowed on 02.09.2021. On 04.10.2021, the Civil Judge ordered return of plaint for compliance of Section 80 CPC. Petitioners filed Writ Petition No.7414/2021 challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 80
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Wife for Murder of Husband and Daughter under Section 302 IPC — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that the chain of circumstances including motive, last...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Finding That Hindu Joint Family Was Not in Existence. Kabuliyat Executed in 1955 and Subsequent Conduct of Parties Established Separation, Barring Claim for Share in Suit Propert...