Search Results for "individual income"

1766 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1766 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Advocate in Forgery Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence — Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC Not Attracted as No Specific Allegation of Dishonest Inducement or Forgery Against Applicant.

The applicant, Mohan Premnath Kothimbire, an advocate practicing in Additional Sessions Court, Omerga, was arrayed as accused No.7 in R.C.C. No.11/200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of HIV-Positive Driver in MSRTC — Discrimination Based on HIV Status Violates Right to Equality and Right to Life. Termination of Driver Solely on Ground of HIV Positivity Set Aside as Unconstitutional and Contrary to National AIDS Policy.

The petitioner, a driver employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), was terminated from service after being tested positive...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Rejection in Coal Transportation Contract. Joint Venture's Bid Rejected for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Experience Condition.

The petitioners, a joint venture between M/s. B. Himmatlal Agrawal and M/s. Puniya Coal Roadlines, challenged the rejection of their bid by Western Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Challenge to Exemption Notifications Under Section 23 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Act. Comparison of Benefits Must Be Holistic, Not Item-by-Item, to Determine if Exemption Is Justified.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi, a registered trade union representing private security guards, filed a writ petition challenging ...