High Court of Bombay at Nagpur hears writ petitions by several individuals against Nagpur Municipal Corporation regarding undisclosed matter.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "income tax appellate tribunal"
1776 result(s) found
Found 1776 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Delayed Refund of Special Additional Duty Under Customs Act — Interest Held Payable From Three Months After Initial Refund Application, Not From Subsequent Follow-Up Application
15 Oct 2024The petitioner, M/s Ajay Industrial Corporation Ltd., filed a refund claim for Special Additional Duty (SAD) of Rs.7,40,458/- on 04 August 2014 under ...
- 715
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.
21 Dec 2016The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...
- 35
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.
21 Dec 2016The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.
11 Dec 2013The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to RERA Refund Order Alleged Void for Want of Jurisdiction. The Petition Tests Whether Supreme Court's Newtech Decision Renders Final Unappealed RERA Orders Non-Est Under Section 71 of RERA Act.
7 Apr 2026The writ petition came before the Bombay High Court raising the issue whether an order passed by the RERA Adjudicating Officer directing refund of Rs....
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Section 14 Order and Possession Notices Due to Lack of Proper Service and Violation of Natural Justice. The court set aside the order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and subsequent possession notices as they were passed without notice to the petitioner, who was not a borrower or guarantor.
22 Sep 2022The petitioner, Satishkumar Surendra Shetty, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 9 February 2017 passed by t...
- 138
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Settlement Commission Order in Central Excise Dispute — Penalty Reduced Due to Full Duty Payment and Co-operation. The court reduced the penalty from Rs. 15 lacs to Rs. 5 lacs under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the petitioner had paid the full duty and co-operated.
19 Dec 2012The petitioner, M/s. Indorama Synthetics (India) Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged an order dated 8/2/2011 of the...
- 180
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Appeal Against Admission of Contempt Petition and Framing of Charge — Holds That Order Admitting Contempt Petition Is Not Appealable Under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The Court Found That the Impugned Order Was Interlocutory and Not Final, Hence the Appeal Was Not Maintainable.
11 Aug 2021The case involves a contempt appeal filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, challenging an order dated 12.03.2018 passed by a lear...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.
1 Mar 2019The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...
- 110
