Search Results for "criminal trial standard"

1954 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1954 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Restored. Complainant's Evidence Sufficient to Prove Debt and Liability Despite Accused's Defence of Property Dispute.

The appellant, Smt. F. Chandra, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment dated 0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eye Witness Testimony and Doubtful Recovery of Weapon. Bitter Gourd Creeper Dispute Leads to Life Imprisonment Reversed as Court Finds Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Chindha Birhade, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his neighbour Devidas, arising from a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Debt. Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, M/s. Pakdhane Cement House, through its proprietor Anandrao Shamrao Pakdhane, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Doctor for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Dr. Rajendra Kapgate, a medical practitioner, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Neeta. The couple married ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Based on Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence. Promise of Marriage to a 12-13 Year Old Girl Constitutes False Promise Vitiating Consent Under Sections 363 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Bhaiyya Subhash Panpatil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness, a child relative of the deceased, gave inconsistent and tutored testimony, and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Avinash @ Pinya Ashok Jadhav, was convicted by the 4th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, City Sessions Court, Sewree, Mumbai, for the m...