Search Results for "Evidence Closed"

3575 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3575 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal in Industrial Dispute — Scope of Enquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Clarified. Labour Court's Order Rejecting Approval for Dismissal Restored as It Did Not Exceed Its Limited Jurisdiction.

The appeal arose from a dispute between John D'Souza, a workman, and the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). The workman joined as a b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bhaurao s/o Raghoji Ingole, a retired headmaster, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case No.2/2002 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Bhandara, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2013 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramesh Waman Bodke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No.271/2012 for the murder of his cousin Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Prosecution Case — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The appellant, Shrikant Laxman Surwase, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Culpable Homicide in Wife's Burn Death. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC for causing death of wife by burns, with knowledge that act was likely to cause death, but without intention to cause death.

The appellant, Francis Devid Batise, was prosecuted along with his mother and another person for the death of his wife Sheela, who sustained burn inju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Over Land Dispute — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient. Brothers convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for killing neighbour; court finds motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anandrao Bapuso Patil and Vilas @ Balaso Bapuso Patil, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of Bhanudas under ...