Search Results for "partnership firm registration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "partnership firm registration"

696 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 696 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Factual Issues and Interpretation of Contractual Terms Are Not Open to Reappreciation in a Section 34 Petition.

2 Apr 2026

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30/09/2024 passed b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Payment of Provident Fund Dues from Bank Sale Proceeds. Section 11(2) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 creates a first charge over assets of the establishment, overriding the claims of a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act.

16 Jun 2026

The petitioner, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 o...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Hears First Appeal Against Permanent Injunction and Damages in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Appeal Challenges Trial Court Decree Restraining Use of 'City Collection' Mark and Awarding Punitive Damages for Deceptive Similarity Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

13 Oct 2021

The litigation involved a trademark and passing off dispute between two mobile phone businesses in Nagpur. The plaintiffs, M/s. City Collection, a reg...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.

5 Feb 2016

Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

22 Jan 2015

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in ESI Coverage Dispute - Section 2A and Regulation 10B Held Mandatory. Employer's Failure to Obtain Code Number Does Not Excuse Contribution Liability Under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

31 Jul 2017

The appeal was filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 against the order...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Against Charity Commissioner's Sanction for Sale of Public Trust Property — Challenge Raised on Grounds of Lack of Public Auction and Violation of Natural Justice Under Section 36 of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950.

29 Mar 2012

The writ petitions challenged the Charity Commissioner's order dated 2/9/2011 granting sanction to the trustees of a public trust to sell trust proper...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders in Suit Under Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in Findings of Courts Below.

6 Jun 2022

The petitioner, M/s Columbia Hospital & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant No.9 in a suit filed by respondent No.1, M/s Maharashtra...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Temporary Injunction Granted to Protect Registered Trademark 'Cothas' Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'Cotha'. Prior Registration and Use of 'Cothas' Since 1995 Establishes Prima Facie Case Under Sections 28 and 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

31 Jul 2017

The appellant, M/s. Cothas Coffee Co., a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents, M/s. Cotha Associ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)