NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018
27 Feb 2019...
Search Results for "ordinary member"
2708 result(s) found
Found 2708 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Application for Decree of Possession Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC — No Clear Admission Found in Society's Letters. Admission Must Be Unambiguous and Unequivocal for Judgment on Admissions; Letters Merely Acknowledging Receipt of Documents Do Not Constitute Admission of Ownership.
5 Feb 2019The plaintiff, Mahesh B. Chaudhary, filed a suit seeking possession of Flat No.17, 1st floor, Radha Sadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., and a dec...
- 124
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.
1 Aug 2026The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Dispute — Upholds Liability of Guarantor but Sets Aside Interest Rate and Costs. The court held that the arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction by awarding interest at 24% per annum and costs without agreement, but upheld the principal liability under the guarantee.
27 Jan 2017The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award da...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Notification Excluding Port Trust Employees from Minimum Wages Act Provisions. The notification dated 15/03/2002 exempting employees from Section 2(h), Section 14 of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Rule 25 of Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 was held ultra vires as not issued by appropriate government.
6 Jul 2017The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mumbai Port Trust Flotilla Worker's Association and Mumbai Port Trust, Dock and General Employees' U...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Daughter's Right to Coparcenary Share Under Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act Despite Father's Death Before 1956 Act. Daughter Granted 1/4th Share in Suit Property as Amendment is Retrospective and Confers Coparcenary Rights from Birth.
29 Aug 2024The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court in a partiti...
- 1955
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Case — Interim Stay on Nomination of Non-Functional Director. Court Examines Interpretation of Section 397 of Companies Act, 1956 Regarding Automatic Winding Up upon Establishing Oppression and Power to Mould Relief.
16 Jun 2025The judgment under consideration arises from two company appeals filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 before the Bombay High Court, chal...
- 19
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.
23 Oct 2019This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...
- 248
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Holds That Right of a Mundkar in a Dwelling House Is Heritable Under Section 3 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. The court interpreted the definition of 'mundkar' to include family members and held that the right to occupy a dwelling house passes to legal heirs upon death.
18 Dec 2013The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed in the High Court of Bombay at Goa, which were heard together to decide the issue of the extent of heri...
- 187
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.
11 Nov 2014The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...
- 181
