Search Results for "interest pendente lite"

321 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Petition Challenging Family Court's Interim Residence Order in Domestic Violence Case. Residence Order Under Section 19 of DV Act Cannot Be Passed as Interim Relief Before Disposal of Main Application Under Section 12.

The petitioner, Mr. Amit Satish Shah, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11 March 2013 passed by the Family Court. The Family Court had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Bank Account Suit — Plaint Rejected as Barred by Limitation Under Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963. Exchange of Correspondence Cannot Extend Limitation Once Right to Sue Accrues.

The appellant, Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd., filed a civil suit in 2005 against the Central Bank of India and another respondent seeking a decree ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Plaintiff's Claim of Bonafide Purchase Fails as Prior Decree in O.S.No.34 of 1984 Was Binding and Sale Deeds Were Executed During Pendency of Litigation.

The appellant, H.Prema Devakumari, was the unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for declaration and injunction. She claimed to have purchased plot No.9 fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Summary Suit for Recovery of Contractual Payment in Earth Filling Work Dispute. Court holds that plaintiff proved contract and performance, and defendant failed to prove defence of poor quality or inflated claims.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Prabha P. Shenai, carrying on business as a proprietress in civil construction works under the name M/s. Sterling Engineering Co.,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioners Not Necessary or Proper Parties Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC. Leasehold Rights Acquired Pending Suit Are Subject to Lis Pendens and Do Not Entitle Impleadment.

The petitioners, Sandeep Ramesh Solanki and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Against Order Rejecting Impleadment in Suit for Specific Performance. Appellants Sought to Be Added as Co-Plaintiffs, Citing Interest in Property and Necessity for Complete Adjudication.

This appeal arose from the order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court rejecting Chamber Summons No.1334/2004, by which the appellants so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Money Recovery Instead of Specific Performance. The High Court erred in granting specific performance as the transaction was found to be a loan with collateral security under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the subsequent purchasers (appellants) against the High Court's decree granting specific performance of an agr...