Search Results for "arbitration jurisdiction"

2872 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2872 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Awards Passed in Hire Purchase Dispute. The Court Examines Objections Relating to Stamp Duty, Admissibility of Documents, and Jurisdiction of the Arbitrator.

The dispute stemmed from a Hire Purchase Agreement dated 24 April 1995 between the petitioners and the respondent for eight Honda Accord cars, accompa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Sets Aside MSME Facilitation Council Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — BSNL Not Liable for Interest Under MSMED Act as Council Had No Territorial Authority Over Dispute Arising from Contract with Chennai Seat of Arbitration.

The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petitions Challenging Two IPL Franchise Arbitration Awards. Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Payment of Rs.384.83 Crore and Return of Rs.153.34 Crore Bank Guarantee with 18% Interest, Which the Franchisor Contested on Jurisdictional and Merits Grounds.

The dispute arose from the Indian Premier League (IPL) franchise agreements between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Kochi fra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Unstamped Arbitration Agreement. Court Must Impound Unstamped Agreement Under Stamp Act Before Proceeding Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act.

The appeal arose from a sub-contract between Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. (appellant) and Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd. (respondent) for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Group of Companies Doctrine to Larger Bench in Arbitration Dispute Over Software Agreement. Questions validity of applying the doctrine to bind non-signatory parent company to arbitration under Sections 8, 11, 35, and 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Cox & Kings Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Upholding Autonomy Amidst Settlement Disputes Exploring Legal Principles and Precedents in Arbitration Law

This Judgment pertains to a legal discussion surrounding arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly focusing on the re...