Search Results for "arbitral award execution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "arbitral award execution"

914 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 914 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

30 Jan 2023

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Compensation for Delay Upheld. Majority Award on Claim for Losses Due to Delay Not Perverse or Contrary to Contract Terms Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Dec 2022

The State of Maharashtra, through the Chief Engineer (Special Projects), Public Works Department, and the Executive Engineer, filed a petition under S...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act for Delay in Filing Section 34 Application — Limitation Period for Challenging Arbitral Award Cannot Be Extended Beyond Statutory Cap. The court held that the appellant's application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was barred by limitation as it was filed over four years after the award, far beyond the three-month period plus thirty-day extension allowed under Section 34(3).

19 Feb 2026

The appellant, Darshana Bhupendra Parekh, filed a First Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the dismissal of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Development Dispute. Court Upholds Damages for Breach but Disallows Compound Interest.

5 Mar 2024

The judgment arises from two arbitration appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common order dated 25th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Seeking Modification of Interest Award — Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion on Interest Rate and Period Not Interfered With

24 Sep 2012

The Petitioner, IMC Limited (formerly United Storage & Tank Terminals Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

4 Feb 2015

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Admitted and Heard Commercial Arbitration Appeal Challenging Single Judge's Refusal to Enforce Three Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Section 50 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Appeal Involves Enforcement Against Non-Signatory Related Companies and Alleged Asset Diversion Through Demerger Schemes to Defeat Execution of ICC London Awards Totaling Over USD 20 Million.

30 Dec 2025

The appeal originated from a dispute between Imax Corporation (appellant) and E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. (first respondent) arising from a Mas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Dispute — Upholds Liability of Guarantor but Sets Aside Interest Rate. The court held that the arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction by awarding interest at 24% per annum with quarterly rests, which was contrary to the contractual rate of 16.5% per annum, and that the award of costs was without reasons.

27 Jan 2017

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award da...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge Against Arbitral Order Granting Opportunity to Cure Resolution Irregularity. Order held not an interim award under Section 2(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as it does not finally determine any issue.

1 Nov 2022

The judgment concerns two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Petitioners (RA Group) challenging an...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)