Search Results for "agreement under section 34(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "agreement under section 34(3)"

274 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

23 Dec 2015

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Parents-in-Law's Petition in Child Custody Jurisdiction Dispute — Family Court at Mysuru Lacks Territorial Jurisdiction as Minor Child Resides with Grandparents in Chamarajanagara District. Jurisdiction under Section 9 of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 is determined by minor's residence, not petitioner's residence.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioners, Samiulla Saheb and Mubeen Taj, are the parents-in-law of the respondent, Mohammed Sameer. The respondent married the petitioners' dau...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Perjury Proceedings in Property Dispute — No Prima Facie Case of False Evidence Established Under Section 340 CrPC. Court Hears Accused on Preliminary Issue and Finds Allegations Unsubstantiated.

22 Dec 2018

The judgment concerns a Civil Application filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Satyanarayan Nandk...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for a Residential Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

11 Jul 2014

The provided judgment text is an incomplete excerpt containing only the listing of multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Amalgamation Scheme of PMC Bank Under Section 45 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Fundamental Rights or Procedural Irregularities; Scheme Upheld as Serving Public Interest and Depositor Protection.

9 Mar 2026

The judgment deals with seven writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging a Notification dated 25 January 2022 issued by the Ministr...

High Court

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.678 OF 2014

10 Nov 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation. Case Involves Actions of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Under B.M.C. Act, 1888.

17 Apr 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Probate Schedule by Prothonotary. Prothonotary has power to allow amendment of schedule of assets in probate proceedings under Section 317 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

11 Oct 2013

The petitioners, Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Bharat Ramanlal Gokal, filed a petition under the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction of the Bombay Hig...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)