Search Results for "Special Bench decision"

10114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Property Dispute. Court holds that Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC requires the plaint to be read as a whole and the defence cannot be considered for deciding whether the suit is barred by law.

The petitioners, original defendants, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 26.04.2011 passed by the Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Employee Retired Prematurely Based on Deemed Age — Resolution Cannot Override Service Rules. The Court held that the Board's resolution deeming age as 18 on appointment date could not reduce the actual retirement age under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code.

The appellant, Gopal Prasad, was appointed as Calligraphist-cum-Assistant of the Bihar School Examination Board on 20 May 1970 at about 15½ years of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Interprets Prospective vs. Retrospective Operation of Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act in Second Appeals. Court Examines Coparcenary Rights of Daughters Born Before and After 2005 Amendment and Whether Division Bench Decision Is Per Incuriam.

This matter came before a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court upon a reference by a learned Single Judge (R.G. Ketkar, J.) who doubted the correctness...