High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Regularization of Temporary Lecturers Under University of Mysore Statutes, 2004. Petitioners Seek Absorption and Regularization in Permanent Teaching Posts.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 84
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010032172018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (04) 3

WRIT PETITION NO.51342/2016(S-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NOs.58783-58785/2016(S-RES), 10472/2016(S-RES), 49665/2015 & 49667-669/2015(S-RES), 22281-22282/2015(S-REG), 21914/2015(S-REG), 18381-18382/2015(S-RES), 49892/2012(S-REG), 10178-10199/2015(S-REG), 17867/2015(S-REG), 46087/2016(S-RES), 15649-15651/2018(S-RES), 8266/2019(S-REG), 12182/2018(S-RES), 16826/2018(S-RES), 7067-7078/2019(S-RES), 10612/2019(S-RES) AND 10673/2019(S-REG)

2019-04-23

R. Devdas

Prof. Ravivarma Kumar, Sri Onkara K B, Sri M.P. Kunju, Sri Mujtaba H, Sri T.A. Ramakrishnappa, Sri Ashok Haranahalli, Sri Vinayaka B, Sri Reuben Jacob, Sri P.S. Rajagopal, Sri T.P. Rajendra Kumar Sungay, Sri P.N. Manmohan, Sri Sridhar N. Hegde

Dr Kantaharaju M and Others (Multiple Petitioners in connected writ petitions)

The State of Karnataka and University of Mysore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Service matter - regularization of temporary lecturers in University of Mysore

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to regularize their services on permanent basis in the posts of lecturers/assistant professors and grant benefits under the University of Mysore (Absorption/Regularization of Temporary Full-time/Part-time Lecturers) Statutes, 2004

Filing Reason

Their services have not been regularized despite being temporary full-time/part-time lecturers for many years

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • University of Mysore (Absorption/Regularization of Temporary Full-time/Part-time Lecturers) Statutes, 2004:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Conviction in IPC Case Due to Valid Compromise. Compromise Validated as Genuine and Non-Heinous Offences Justify Quashing Under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reviews Interim Injunction in Bottling Agreement and Trade Mark Dispute; Division Bench Restrained Licensee from Dealing with Competing Brands. Negative Covenant in 1993 Agreement and Unauthorized Share Transfer to Pepsi Affiliates Form...