KAHC010023912010_1
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "Section 11(6)"
2264 result(s) found
Found 2264 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment in Writ Petition Against CIC Order Directing Disclosure of Husband's Income Tax Returns Under RTI Act. Petitioner Contended That Information Is Exempt Under Section 8(1)(e) of Right to Information Act, 2005, Being Held in Fiduciary Capacity by Income Tax Department.
21 Feb 2026This writ petition was filed by the Income Tax Officer and Chief Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the Income Tax Department's Centralised Processi...
- 36
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.
13 Dec 2024The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...
- 621
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Family Business Dispute. Dispute Centers on Inclusion of Agricultural Lands Held by Individual Family Members in Family Asset Separation Process.
14 Jun 2013The appeal arose from a family dispute within the Malhotra family of Pune, who owned and controlled several businesses including Weikfield Products Co...
- 19
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Creditor's Application for Secured Creditor Status in Liquidation; Cooperative Bank's Claim Based on Unregistered Mortgage and Recovery Certificate Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. A Recovery Certificate ordering attachment and sale does not create a charge on company assets without registration under Section 125 of the Companies Act, 1956, and an unregistered mortgage is void against the Official Liquidator.
3 Jun 2019This matter arose in the winding up of Satwik Electric Controls Private Limited (the Company), ordered to be wound up on 19 July 2007. City Coop Credi...
- 43
High Court
High Court Hears Writ Petition by Auction Purchaser Against Revenue Tribunal's Order in Tenancy Dispute — Tahsildar's Declaration of Tenancy Under MTAL Act Challenged. The Court Examined Whether the Revenue Authorities Properly Exercised Jurisdiction in Fixing Purchase Price Under Section 32G Without Prima Facie Evidence of Cultivation.
5 Feb 2019The writ petition arose from a long-standing dispute over a parcel of land bearing Survey No. 318, Hissa No. 7A, area 1 Acre 12 Gunthas at Village Dah...
- 33
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.
1 Aug 2026The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...
- 120
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Petitioners in Land Acquisition Case for NHAI Expressway, Directing Recalculation of Additional Compensation on Multiplied Market Value Under Section 30(3) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The Court Held That Additional Compensation @12% Must Be Computed on the Market Value Determined Under Section 26(2) After Applying Multiplication Factor 2, Not on the Base Market Value Under Section 26(1).
10 Mar 2026The petitioners, Sureshbhai Ravajibhai Ahir and others, were landowners whose lands were acquired for the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) u...
- 106
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Quashing of Cheque Dishonour Proceedings for Lack of Specific Averments Under Section 141 NI Act. Directors Contend Complaints Merely Name Them Without Alleging Active Role in Day-to-Day Affairs.
1 Jul 2026The case concerns multiple criminal petitions filed by Kavitha Chopra and Dhirendra Chopra, directors of OSIA Hyper Retail Limited, seeking to quash p...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Port Trust's Demand for Damages as Unauthorized Detention of Vessel — No Power Under Major Port Trusts Act to Withhold Port Clearance for General Damages Claims. Port Trust's claim for damages from explosion and fire on vessel not covered under Section 116 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, hence cannot detain vessel.
28 Aug 2014The petitioners, Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd. (a Korean company) and its agent Samudra Marine Services Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...
- 113
