Search Results for "Premature writ petition"

768 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 768 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments in Co-operative Housing Society. Court Holds That Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments Without General Body Approval Are Void Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, B. K. Corporation, an association of persons, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of a re-development agreement and bye-law...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits to Retired Ayurvedic College Staff. Employees who took voluntary retirement are entitled to pension and gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as the college is a government-aided institution.

The petitioners, seven retired employees of Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya (Respondent No. 4), an Ayurvedic college in Solapur, filed a wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes FIRs in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature and Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegations of cheating, forgery, and criminal trespass found to be civil disputes without criminal ingredients under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 447, 427, 506(ii) read with 34 IPC.

The judgment concerns three connected criminal writ petitions arising from a land dispute in Salvador-Do-Mundo, Goa. The petitioners in WPCR 64/2021 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Prohibition of Trial and Re-investigation in Murder Case. Court holds that the petition is premature as the trial is at initial stage and the accused has alternative remedies under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The petitioner, Ankit Biranwar, is an accused in Crime No. 399/2019 registered at Ram Nagar Police Station, Gondia, for offences under Sections 302, 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions Against Order Quashing MPSC Selection Process for Non-Compliance with Reservation Roster. Court Held That MPSC's Failure to Maintain 200-Point Roster for Backlog Vacancies Violated Constitutional Mandate Under Articles 16(4) and 16(4B).

The case involves multiple review petitions and a contempt petition arising from a writ petition filed by Makrand Subhash Dagadkhair challenging the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bye-Election to Fill Casual Vacancy in Katol Assembly Constituency. Section 151A of Representation of the People Act, 1951 Mandates Filling Casual Vacancy Within Six Months, and the Election Schedule Complies with the Statutory Time Limit.

The petitioner, Sandeep Yashwantrao Sarode, Chairman of Panchayat Samiti, Katol, and Director of Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol, filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Zilla Panchayat Election Notification Due to Delay and Laches. Petitions Filed After Commencement of Election Process Are Not Maintainable Under Article 226 of Constitution of India and Section 308 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

The petitioners, who were Zilla Panchayat members from various constituencies in Chitradurga District, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Voluntary Retirement Due to Pending Disciplinary Proceedings and CBI Investigation. Rule 56(k) of CCS Rules Does Not Confer Unilateral Right to Retire When Serious Allegations Are Under Investigation.

The petitioner, Dr. Sanjay Sharma, joined Tata Memorial Hospital as Assistant Surgeon on 29th November 1985 and was later appointed Professor of Surge...