Search Results for "FIR admissibility"

271 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 271 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder and Criminal Conspiracy in Gang-Related Killing. Conviction under Sections 302 and 120B IPC based on circumstantial evidence and motive established through prior enmity.

The case involves three appellants, Faim @ Lala Ibrahim Khan, Kamlesh @ Babla @ Bablya Shankar Malpedi, and Haresh @ Harsh Prabhakar Patil, who were c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad Examined Conviction Under Sections 498A, 306 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act in Appeal. Dying Declaration Contradictions and Procedural Irregularities Raised as Grounds to Set Aside Trial Court’s Judgment.

The appeal challenged the conviction of the appellant-husband for offences under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 7 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Hanumantharayappa, was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, in Sessions Case No. 81/2013 for the offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence and unreliable witnesses.

The appellant, Anil Shrawan More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicated a Commercial Suit for Recovery of Chit Maturity Amount Against a Partnership Firm and Partners. The plaintiff claimed the maturity value based on an acknowledgment of liability and promissory estoppel, while the defendants raised a prior suit for injunction and accounts.

The plaintiff, a construction company, filed a commercial suit against a partnership firm (first defendant) and its partners (defendants 2 to 6) for r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Applicants in NDPS Case — No Recovery from Applicants, Only Co-accused. Section 37 NDPS Act Not Attracted as Applicants Not Found in Conscious Possession of Contraband.

The applicants, Hetan Ram Gangwani and Yash Ram Gangwani, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking anti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty for Three Accused in Kidnap, Gang Rape, and Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence and DNA Linkage Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by three convicts challenging the common judgment of the Delhi High Court which affirmed their conviction and deat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Narhari Suryawanshi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedpur, for the murder of his nephew Laxman under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Smt. Shobha Sonba Raut, was serving as Sub-Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer at Osmanabad. The complainant, Dattatraya Ar...