Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Applicants in NDPS Case — No Recovery from Applicants, Only Co-accused. Section 37 NDPS Act Not Attracted as Applicants Not Found in Conscious Possession of Contraband.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, Hetan Ram Gangwani and Yash Ram Gangwani, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime Register No.346 of 2024 registered at Uran Police Station, Maharashtra, for offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The case arose from a seizure of contraband from a co-accused, not from the applicants. The applicants apprehended arrest and approached the High Court. The State opposed the bail, citing the stringent provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The court examined the material on record and found that no recovery was made from the applicants and there was no evidence of conscious possession. The court held that the bar under Section 37 NDPS Act was not attracted as there was no prima facie case against the applicants. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail to the applicants subject to conditions, including furnishing a personal bond and surety, and cooperating with the investigation.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 438 - Anticipatory Bail - NDPS Act - Section 37 - Bar on bail - Applicants apprehending arrest in NDPS case where no contraband recovered from them - Held that Section 37 bar not attracted as there is no prima facie case of conscious possession against applicants - Bail granted on conditions (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicants are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in a case under the NDPS Act where no recovery was made from them and the only recovery was from a co-accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the anticipatory bail application and directed that the applicants be released on bail in the event of arrest, subject to conditions including furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety, and cooperating with the investigation.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 37 NDPS Act
  • conscious possession
  • recovery from co-accused
  • prima facie case
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (09) 69

Anticipatory Bail Application No.2253 of 2025

2025-09-30

Amit Borkar, J.

2025:BHC-AS:41371

Mr. P.A. Pol, Mr. Sharad Suryawanshi, Mr. Ranjit Hatkar i/by Pol Legal Juris for the applicant; Mrs. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, APP for respondent No.1-State

Hetan Ram Gangwani and Yash Ram Gangwani

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC in a criminal case under the NDPS Act.

Remedy Sought

The applicants sought anticipatory bail to avoid arrest in Crime Register No.346 of 2024.

Filing Reason

The applicants apprehended arrest in connection with an NDPS case where contraband was recovered from a co-accused, not from them.

Issues

Whether the applicants are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. Whether the bar under Section 37 NDPS Act applies when no recovery is made from the applicants.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that no contraband was recovered from them and they were not in conscious possession. State opposed bail citing Section 37 NDPS Act and the seriousness of the offence.

Ratio Decidendi

The bar under Section 37 NDPS Act is not attracted when there is no prima facie case of conscious possession against the applicants, especially when no recovery is made from them.

Judgment Excerpts

The applicants, apprehending arrest in connection with Crime Register No.346 of 2024 registered with Uran Police Station... Held that Section 37 bar not attracted as there is no prima facie case of conscious possession against applicants.

Procedural History

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, which was heard and disposed of on 30 September 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 438
  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: Section 37
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Over Recovery of Possession. The substantial question of law regarding Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 was answere...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide in Fatal Assault Case. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC for causing death by intentionally inflicting injuries with knowledge that it was likely to cause death.