Search Results for "Bombay Stamp Act 1958"

318 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 318 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Claim in Execution Proceedings — ING Bank N.V. Fails to Prove Ownership of Attached Flat. Claim under Section 47 CPC and Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 rejected as bank did not establish that the flat was not owned by judgment debtor.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by ING Bank N.V., a third party, under Section 47 read with Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 of the Code of Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Revenue Authorities to Consider Petitioners' Applications for NA Permission and Mutation in Land Revenue Matter. Writ of mandamus issued to Collector and Talathi to process applications under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of land bearing Old Survey No.447, New Survey No.142, Hissa No.4 admeasuring 4310 sq.meters at village Navghar,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Secondary Evidence Application in Specific Performance Suit. Trial Court Directed to Permit Plaintiffs to Lead Evidence of Lost Agreement to Sell Upon Establishing Foundational Facts Under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the original plaintiffs against an order of the trial court rejecting t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Second Appeal on Questions of Law Concerning Insolvency Act and Auction Sale Confirmation. The Court Framed Eight Substantial Questions Involving Interpretation of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, and Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings.

The matter concerned a long-standing insolvency dispute dating back to 1959. Roopsingh Chainsingh Ture filed Insolvency Application No.12 of 1959 befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients.

The case involves two appeals against the judgment of the Special Court, Khamgaon, convicting the appellants under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Sect...