Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

2656 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2656 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Parties Exclusively Agreed to Pune Courts Under Selling Agency Agreement Clause 8. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract Prevents Bombay High Court from Entertaining Section 34 Petition Despite Respondent's Registered Office in Mumbai.

7 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Unitech Texmech Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Section 9 Petition in Post-Foreign Award Enforcement Against Guarantor Deleted from Proceedings. Court Examines Applicability of Group of Companies Doctrine to Bind Non-Signatory for Interim Relief.

28 Jan 2026

The petition was filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Ningbo Aux Imp & Exp Co. Ltd., a Chinese company, seeking inte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Section 8 Application in Suit for Declaration of Deed as Void. Arbitration Clause in Agreements Held Not Applicable to Challenge to Registered Conveyance Deed as It Is Not a Dispute Arising from the Agreements.

10 Dec 2021

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed S.C. Suit No.1512 of 2021 before the Civil Judge, Senior Division at Vadgaon, Pune, seeking a declaration ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

6 Nov 2020

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Despite Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Notice Period. The court held that the respondent's failure to respond to the notice and its conduct constituted waiver of the 30-day notice requirement under Clause 64(3)(b)(ii) of the Indian Railways Standard General Conditions of Contract.

3 Apr 2024

The applicant, S. N. Naik & Brothers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with the Union of India (respondent) on 23.09.2019 for constructi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitrator Appointment in ISRO Contract Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Appointment by Delhi Arbitration Centre without consent of Union of India held invalid under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Union of India represented by the Ministry of Space (ISRO), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Foreign Award Enforcement. Court holds that under the amended Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, only the High Court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the award can entertain interim measures, not any court where assets are located.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Trammo DMCC, a company incorporated in the UAE, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable Due to Failure to Issue Prior Notice Under Section 34(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Held That the Requirement of Prior Notice Is Mandatory and a Condition Precedent for Filing a Section 34 Application.

19 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Termination of Arbitrator's Mandate for Lack of Section 21 Notice and De Jure Ineligibility Under Section 12 of Arbitration Act. The court held that a valid Section 21 notice is mandatory for commencement of arbitration and that an arbitrator must disclose circumstances affecting independence, failing which the mandate can be terminated.

9 Jan 2023

The applicants, Sanjeev Kumar Kailash Prasad Agarwalla and Maya Sanjeev Kumar Agarwalla, filed two applications under Section 11(5) read with Sections...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Pass Award Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act. Court Appoints Substitute Arbitrator After Original Arbitrator Failed to Conclude Proceedings Despite Multiple Extensions.

16 Jun 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Madhav Structural Engineers Limited, filed a petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking term...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)