NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
30 Nov 2005The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...
Search Results for "Explanation sale"
3293 result(s) found
Found 3293 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Vessel Under Customs Act, 1962; Seizure of Re-imported Floating Crane Valid as Exemption Notification Inapplicable When Re-import Not by Original Exporter.
5 Apr 2019The case involved a writ petition filed by Fomento Resources Private Limited and its director challenging the seizure of a floating crane, MV Maria La...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Whether an Authorised Dealer Compliant with RBI's FLM Instructions Can Be Held Liable under Sections 6(4) and 6(5) of FERA; Maintainability Not Disputed Despite Co-Noticees' Failure to Appeal.
14 Oct 2010This matter concerns two appeals filed under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) before the High Court of Bombay, challenging an order of the A...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Anganwadi Sevika for Violation of Natural Justice — Show Cause Notice Not Served and Enquiry Not Conducted Before Dismissal. The court held that dismissal without enquiry and without serving show cause notice is unsustainable and directed reinstatement with continuity of service but without back wages.
31 Jan 2022The petitioner, Smt. Surekha w/o Anandrao Kalshetti, was appointed as an Anganwadi Sevika in Anganwadi No.173 at village Nandgaon, Taluka Tuljapur, Di...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Part in Income Tax Dispute Involving Disallowances Under Section 14A, Section 37, and Section 10B. The court held that Section 14A disallowance requires satisfaction of AO, scientific research expenditure not allowable, demurrage is business expenditure, and Section 10B deduction remanded.
7 May 2021The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had partly allowed the...
- 40
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows SEBI's Appeal Against Securities Appellate Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Penalties for Fraudulent Diversion of Funds. The Court Held That Immediate Diversion of Preferential Allotment Proceeds from Disclosed Objects Constitutes Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Under SEBI PFUTP Regulations, 2003, and Ratification Cannot Cure Such Violations.
17 Mar 2026The dispute arose from Securities and Exchange Board of India's (SEBI) action against Terrascope Ventures Limited (formerly Moryo Industries Limited) ...
- 820
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Food Adulteration Proceedings Due to Delayed Complaint Beyond Shelf Life of Sample. Prosecution Not Maintainable as Accused's Right to Reanalysis Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Was Lost.
21 Jun 2010The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of criminal applications filed by various accused persons—proprietors, partners,...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Upholding Maintainability of Arbitral Award Execution before Commercial Court. Execution Petition Held Competent Under Section 10(3) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as an Application Arising Out of Arbitration, Overruling Objections Based on Order XXI CPC.
10 Jun 2025Abraham Memorial Education Trust, the petitioner and judgment debtor, challenged an order of the XI Additional District and Sessions Judge (Dedicated ...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Bar of Limitation — Claim Under Section 7 IBC Held Time-Barred as Debt Arose Before 2006 and Application Filed in 2018. The court held that the Limitation Act applies to IBC proceedings and the application was filed beyond three years from the date of default.
2 Sep 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Radha Exports (India) Pvt. Limited against the judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribun...
- 193
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rent Authority Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Failure to Consider Tenant's Objections and Violation of Natural Justice. The Court set aside the Competent Authority's order under Section 25(2) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, as the tenant was not heard and the order was passed without jurisdiction.
3 Sep 2025The petitioner, a tenant in a building owned by respondent No.3, challenged an order dated 30 July 2024 passed by the Competent Authority (Rent Act) u...
- 37
