Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Anganwadi Sevika for Violation of Natural Justice — Show Cause Notice Not Served and Enquiry Not Conducted Before Dismissal. The court held that dismissal without enquiry and without serving show cause notice is unsustainable and directed reinstatement with continuity of service but without back wages.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 85
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Surekha w/o Anandrao Kalshetti, was appointed as an Anganwadi Sevika in Anganwadi No.173 at village Nandgaon, Taluka Tuljapur, District Osmanabad on 23.06.1993. She claimed to have rendered satisfactory services with an unblemished record. On 23.07.1999, the Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad issued a show cause notice alleging that an enquiry revealed the petitioner's mother was caught red-handed while carrying 120 kg of green-peas for sale, and that 57 kg of green-peas and 11 kg of rice were found in the Anganwadi above the stock. The petitioner responded denying the allegations, stating her mother ran a small grocery business and that the Police Patil and Sarpanch had made false allegations due to enmity. However, without any further enquiry, the Chief Executive Officer passed an order on 25.09.2012 dismissing the petitioner from service. The petitioner appealed to the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, who dismissed the appeal on 30.04.2019. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. The court observed that the show cause notice was issued in 1999, but the dismissal order was passed in 2012, and there was no evidence of any enquiry conducted in the interregnum. The court noted that the petitioner had specifically denied the allegations and requested an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, but no such opportunity was given. The court held that the dismissal order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice as no show cause notice was served and no enquiry was conducted. The court quashed and set aside the orders of the Chief Executive Officer and the Divisional Commissioner, directed reinstatement of the petitioner with continuity of service, but denied back wages as the petitioner had not worked during the period.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Dismissal - Natural Justice - Show Cause Notice - Enquiry - The petitioner was dismissed from the post of Anganwadi Sevika without any show cause notice being served and without any enquiry being conducted, in violation of principles of natural justice. The court held that the dismissal order passed by the Chief Executive Officer and confirmed by the Divisional Commissioner cannot be sustained and are quashed and set aside. (Paras 1-10)

B) Service Law - Reinstatement - Continuity of Service - Back Wages - The court directed reinstatement of the petitioner with continuity of service but without back wages, as the petitioner had not worked during the intervening period. (Para 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dismissal of the petitioner from the post of Anganwadi Sevika without conducting a proper enquiry and without serving a show cause notice is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed and set aside the order of dismissal dated 25.09.2012 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad and the order dated 30.04.2019 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad. The court directed the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Anganwadi Sevika with continuity of service but without back wages.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Show Cause Notice
  • Enquiry Before Dismissal
  • Anganwadi Sevika
  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (01) 50

Writ Petition No.13942 of 2021

2022-01-31

Smt. Bharati H. Dangre

Shri Santosh N. Patne, Shri A.A. Jagatkar, Shri Suhas B. Ghute Patil

Smt. Surekha w/o Anandrao Kalshetti

The State of Maharashtra, The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad, The Child Development Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Service Scheme, Project – Murum (Alur)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging dismissal from service and appellate order.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of dismissal order dated 25.09.2012 and appellate order dated 30.04.2019, and reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was dismissed from the post of Anganwadi Sevika without proper enquiry and without serving show cause notice, in violation of principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad dismissed the petitioner on 25.09.2012. Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad dismissed the appeal on 30.04.2019.

Issues

Whether the dismissal of the petitioner without conducting any enquiry and without serving a show cause notice is sustainable in law. Whether the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she was not served with any show cause notice and no enquiry was conducted before dismissal, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents argued that the show cause notice was issued and the petitioner responded, and the dismissal was justified based on the allegations.

Ratio Decidendi

Dismissal of an employee without conducting any enquiry and without serving a show cause notice is in gross violation of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained. The order of dismissal and the appellate order confirming it are liable to be quashed and set aside. However, back wages are not granted as the employee did not work during the intervening period.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner came to be appointed as the 'Anganwadi Sevika' in Anganwadi No.173 at village Nandgaon, Taluka Tuljapur, District Osmanabad, by order dated 23.06.1993. The show cause notice was issued in the year 1999 and the order of dismissal came to be passed in the year 2012. There is nothing on record to show that any enquiry was conducted in the interregnum. The order of dismissal passed by the Chief Executive Officer and confirmed by the Divisional Commissioner cannot be sustained and are quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner as Anganwadi Sevika with continuity of service but without back wages.

Procedural History

Petitioner appointed as Anganwadi Sevika on 23.06.1993. Show cause notice issued on 23.07.1999. Dismissal order passed by Chief Executive Officer on 25.09.2012. Appeal dismissed by Divisional Commissioner on 30.04.2019. Writ petition filed in 2021 and decided on 31.01.2022.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Orders in Murder Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by High Court. Bail granted under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149, 120-B IPC and Explosive Substances Act set aside for lack of proper consideration of evidence.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Waiver of Cooling-Off Period in Mutual Consent Divorce Under Goa Law of Divorce — Applies Amardeep Singh Principles. Husband and Wife Jointly Challenge Trial Court's Refusal to Waive One-Year Period Under Article 40, Succee...