Search Results for "application returned"

4709 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4709 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Insurance Ombudsman Award Upholding Health Insurance Claim. Court Examines Applicability of Two-Year Exclusion for Disc Prolapse Under Clause 3(a) of Family Floater Policy.

The dispute arose from a health insurance claim under a Star Comprehensive Insurance Policy issued by Star Health and Allied Insurance Co. Ltd. to Res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Returning Plaint for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Suit for Injunction and Damages. The Court Held That for Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Only Plaint Averments Are Relevant, Not Evidence.

The appellant, Bharat Bhushan Gupta, filed a suit for mandatory and prohibitory injunction and recovery of damages against the respondents, Pratap Nar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Waste Management Contract Dispute — Petitioner Granted Protection Against Termination and Bank Guarantee Invocation Pending Arbitration.

The petitioner, PMP Infratech Pvt Ltd, an AA Class Government Registered Civil Contractor, was engaged by the respondent, Bharat Petro Resources Ltd (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Challenge to Executing Court's Order Allowing Deposit of Balance Consideration in Specific Performance Suit. The court held that the Executing Court has power to permit deposit beyond the decree's time limit when delay is unintentional and no stay is granted.

The petitioner, Ruprao Nagorao Zade, was the judgment debtor in a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The suit wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Territorial Jurisdiction and Interim Relief. Held that DRT Ahmedabad had jurisdiction to entertain the bank's recovery application and that the Appellate Tribunal's refusal to grant interim relief was justified.

The petitioner, M/s. GTCL Mobile-Com Technology Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, challenged two orders: (1) an order dated 14-11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Asian Paints VAT Case — Input Tax Credit on Capital Goods Allowed Despite Non-Use in Manufacturing. Section 11(4) of KVAT Act, 2003 does not restrict ITC on capital goods used for generation of electricity for own consumption.

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) read with Section 9...