Search Results for "arbitrary administrative action"

1974 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1974 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka disposes writ petitions filed by home loan borrowers seeking restraint and no due certificate; court issues directions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by individual home loan borrowers against the Union of India, Ministry of Finance, R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification in Tender Process for Canal Restoration Work. Petitioner Disqualified for Non-Compliance with Essential Conditions of Digital Signature and IP Address Submission.

The petitioner, M/s. Surendra Infrastructure (P) Ltd., challenged its disqualification in the technical evaluation of an e-tender for restoration of c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Entertainment Tax Exemption for IPL Matches — State Government's Policy Decision Not Interfered With. Policy Decision on Tax Exemption Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioner, a sitting Member of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the propriety of the decision...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging FEMA Show Cause Notices Against BCCI President. Section 42 of FEMA applies to persons in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of a company, and the petitioner as President is covered.

The petitioner, Shashank Vyankatesh Manohar, was the President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) from 2008 to 2011. During this peri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Rejection in Coal Transportation Contract. Joint Venture's Bid Rejected for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Experience Condition.

The petitioners, a joint venture between M/s. B. Himmatlal Agrawal and M/s. Puniya Coal Roadlines, challenged the rejection of their bid by Western Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tribunal Order for Ignoring Binding Precedent in Section 14A Disallowance Case. Tribunal's refusal to follow earlier decision of the same court on identical issue held to be a jurisdictional error warranting interference under Article 226.

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 23 September ...