Search Results for "specific performance"

4724 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4724 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Finding of Loan Transaction Instead of Sale Agreement. Agreement to sell held to be a security for loan, not a genuine sale agreement, and plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract.

The petitioner, Smt. Shobha Janardhan Masram, filed a civil suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 25-11-1994, claiming that the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Binding. Court holds that first appellate court's reversal of trial court's decree was based on evidence and not perverse under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment of the first...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property — No Concluded Contract Found. Agreement for Sale Not Established as Essential Terms Were Not Finalized and No Written Contract Executed Under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appellants, Rizvi Builders, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged agreement for sale of a property in Panaji, Goa, owned by responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion in Suit for Specific Performance — Plaintiffs Fail to Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Developer. Agreement for Sale Not Concluded as Essential Terms Remained Unsettled, No Enforceable Contract Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The plaintiffs, a group of 52 individuals, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged agreement for sale of flats in a building to be constru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint After 30 Years in Property Suit — No Prejudice as Trial Not Commenced. Pre-Trial Amendment Permissible Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Despite Delay, as No New Cause of Action Introduced.

The present writ petition arises out of a civil suit filed in 1993 by the original plaintiffs, Smt. Bertha Carvalho and Shri Ross Carvalho, against th...