Search Results for "section 34"

603 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 603 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Owner's Petition for Rental Compensation Prior to Section 4 Notification in Land Acquisition Case. Possession Lost Before Notification Does Not Entitle Owner to Additional Compensation Under Section 34 or Rental Compensation Under Government Policy.

The petitioner, Tukaram Maruti Pawar, was a land owner whose land was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for a minor irrigation project. He lost pos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Domain Name Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice. Lack of Proper Notice to Registrant Renders Award Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Telepathy Inc., a US-based company, was the registrant of the domain name 'fls.in' registered on 24 March 2005. Respondent No.5, Flsmi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in LPG Distributorship Termination Dispute. Clause 29 of Distributorship Agreement Allowed Termination Without Assigning Reasons, and Arbitrator's Findings Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Prasad Gas Agency, was appointed as a distributor of LPG (Bharat Gas) by the respondent, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Surplus Land Under Urban Land Ceiling Act. Petitioners' claim for housing scheme under Section 20 rejected as they failed to comply with statutory requirements and the land was already allotted to a trust.

The petitioners, legal representatives of original landowners, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...