Search Results for "safe distance"

486 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 486 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Wife Murder Case Due to Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as chain of circumstances did not exclude possibility of suicide.

The appellant, Prashant Mahatme, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of his wife Rajni under Section 302 IPC and for causing di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative of deceased and testimony was inconsistent with medical evidence.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the appellants challenging their conviction under Sections 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Preliminary Objection in Election Petition No. 11 of 2009 Alleging EVM Tampering and Excess Expenditure. The Court Hears Arguments on Maintainability Under Sections 81(3) and 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The judgment pertains to an election petition filed by Dr. Madhavrao Kinhalkar, an independent candidate, challenging the election of Ashok Shankarrao...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Criminal Appeals in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC, Examining Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Appellants Challenge Reliability of Recovery and Chain of Custody, Arguing Investigation Delays Vitiate Conviction.

The case arose from a violent incident on 19.1.2011 in Timki Mochipura, Nagpur, where Dinesh Shendekar was killed and his brother Deva and another per...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears and Decides Batch of Appeals Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Regarding Compensation for Kakhandaki Village Lands. The Court Examined Market Value Determinations Made by the Reference Court Under Sections 18 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Background: A batch of appeals and cross objections were filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 189...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Landlord's Challenge to MRT Order Granting Tenant Declaration Under Bombay Tenancy Act. Dispute Involves Agricultural Land Where MRT Overturned Concurrent Findings, Applying Deemed Tenancy Under Section 4 and Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The matter arose from a tenancy application filed by the respondent under Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Revision Against Summons for Offence Under Section 92 of Factories Act, 1948 for Alleged Violation of Rule 79-A(b) of Karnataka Factories Rules, 1969. Director Argues Lack of Vicarious Liability and Procedural Flaws, but Full Order Not Available.

The revision petition was filed by a director of Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing beverages, seeking to qua...