Search Results for "park zone"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "park zone"

249 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 249 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ of Mandamus to Remove Encroachments on Public Amenity Land in Coimbatore Layout. OSR Land Sale Held Void; Regularisation of Plot Does Not Validate Encroachment on Common Area.

15 Apr 2026

The petitioner, D. Satishkumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the responde...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Review Petition to Correct Clerical Error in Writ Order Regarding Gifted Land. Court Held That Review Is Maintainable for Correction of Clerical or Arithmetical Mistakes Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

24 Feb 2026

The case involves a review petition filed by J.H.Najumudeen, the petitioner, seeking correction of a clerical error in the order dated 05.01.2026 pass...

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Amendment to Co-operative Societies Rules. Petitioners Seek Declaration that G.O. Miscellaneous No.11 and Seniority List are Ultra Vires Constitution.

20 Feb 2025

The matter comprised multiple writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The p...

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Amendment to Rule 7(3) and Seniority List in Co-operative Banks. Petitioners Seek Declaration that G.O. and Seniority List are Ultra Vires and Violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioners, employees of various District Central Co-operative Banks, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Storm Water Drain Construction Due to Title Dispute; Directs Civil Court Remedy. Court Holds that Disputed Questions of Title Cannot Be Resolved Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Requiring a Trial by Competent Civil Court.

13 Feb 2025

The petitioners, joint owners of a business premises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Storm Water Drain Construction on Private Land. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title Cannot Be Adjudicated in Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

13 Feb 2025

The petitioners, S.Ramesh and S.Anand, joint owners of business premises in Vadaperumbakkam Village, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

24 Aug 2023

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Contract Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

6 Jun 2022

The Appellant, Chitali Bottling Limited, filed a Special Civil Suit No.95 of 2020 before the 19th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, seeking a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Compulsory Purchase of Property Under Chapter XXC of Income Tax Act — Delay in Passing Order Does Not Invalidate Acquisition. The period of two months under Section 269UD(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for passing an order for compulsory purchase is directory, not mandatory, and the order passed after 16 years was upheld.

30 Jul 2013

The petitioners, Satish Balan, Ratish Balan, Janki Balan, and Adarsh Sehtty, entered into an agreement for purchase of a property admeasuring 555 sq. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Dispute Over Plot Allotment for Hotel Construction. Dispute arose from non-payment of balance lease premium and alleged failure to achieve milestones by CIDCO.

16 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Discovery Properties & Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)