Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Involving Cooperative Housing Societies and Developer Over MOFA Compliance. Pleadings Involve Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and Role of District Deputy Registrar.
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "leasehold rights"
360 result(s) found
Found 360 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Suit Against MSEB in Rent Control Dispute — State Government Not the Tenant. The court held that MSEB was the tenant and the suit was maintainable, setting aside the concurrent decrees of the lower courts.
17 Dec 2024The petitioner, The Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (HSBC), filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent judgments of the Small C...
- 476
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application Seeking Ratification of Sale Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 — Court Ratifies Sale of Property by Company in Liquidation to Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice of Winding Up Petition.
10 Jun 2024The Bombay High Court allowed an interim application filed by the applicant seeking a declaration that the sale agreement dated 5th September 2007 was...
- 571
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Reopening Based on Change of Opinion Not Permissible. The court held that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen an assessment on the same material already examined in the original assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
10 Feb 2023The petitioner, Bharat Amratlal Shah, challenged a notice dated 31 March 2021 issued under Section 148 read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 19...
- 26
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
16 Jul 2021The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...
- 153
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Writ Petition Seeking Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act. Court Holds Government Not Obligated to Re-Acquire Its Own Land and Compensation Limited to Sanad Terms, Not The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
16 Mar 2020The petitioner, a tyre manufacturing company, was allotted government land at Bhandup, Mumbai, in the 1960s–70s under Sanads issued pursuant to acqu...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in Stamp Duty Dispute — Conveyance Deed Not Exempt Under Article 5(e) of Schedule I of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) by CIDCO to Developer Held Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance, Not as Instrument of Lease or License.
14 Nov 2019The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and other stamp authorities against a common judgment of a learned Sing...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorized Subletting and Misuse of Premises Under MHADA Act. Tenant failed to prove lawful sub-tenancy and used residential premises for commercial purposes, violating terms of allotment.
7 Apr 2016The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Trivikram Wagle, was a tenant of a residential premises owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHA...
- 130
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Relief from Lis Pendens in Specific Performance Suit — Transfer of Property Act Section 52. Court allows defendant to be relieved from lis pendens upon deposit of Rs.8 lakhs, balancing plaintiff's claim with defendant's right to deal with property.
9 Oct 2013The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 13 September 2013 in a motion taken out by the Appellant, the original Plaintiff, du...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Rent Controller's Permission to Evict Tenant for Arrears of Rent but Rejects Habitual Defaulter Ground. Landlord's claim for habitual default fails due to lack of specific pleading and proof under clause 13(3)(ii) of C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949.
6 Nov 2006The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The landlord, Ganesh Tukaram Lonkar, so...
- 106
