Search Results for "land revenue recovery"

1419 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1419 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Seeking Priority Over Sales Tax Dues. Sales Tax Department's First Charge Under Section 38C of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Prevails Over Secured Creditor's Rights Under Securitisation Act, 2002.

The Thane Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. (the Bank) filed a writ petition challenging the action of the Sales Tax Department in attaching the property of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records. Held that Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Civil Suit Is Appropriate Remedy for Title Disputes.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of certain agricultural lands in Nashik, filed a writ petition challenging a mutation entry made in favor of re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Government Resolution Prescribing Fees for Permission to Mortgage Occupancy Class II Lands. Condition Imposing Payment of Fees Held Valid Under Section 43 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 and Not Violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, BILT Graphic Paper Products Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in paper manufacturing, challenged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.

The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapse. Petitioners contend that acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Sections 24, 25 of the 2013 Act due to non-making of award within prescribed period.

These writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition proceedings. The petitioners, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of RERA Order and Grants Interim Relief of Deposit and Injunction Against Developer. RERA Order Directing Refund of Investment with Interest Must Be Complied With by Revenue Authorities and Developer.

The petitioner, Rustam Phiroze Mehta, filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of an order dated 15th April 2019 passed by the Maharashtra Real Estat...