Search Results for "ineffective purchase"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "ineffective purchase"

238 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Co-owner Property Dispute — Holds That Possession of Co-owner Is Not Adverse Without Ouster. The court ruled that the burden of proving ouster lies on the party claiming adverse possession, and the suit for declaration and possession was within limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

29 Oct 2015

The case involves a property dispute among co-owners. The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and possession of agr...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017

5 Feb 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Issues Ruling in Writ Petition No. 8428 of 2019 Regarding Property Dispute. The Petition Involves a Dispute Between Multiple Parties over Property Matters, Addressed Under the Writ Jurisdiction of the High Court.

7 May 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Tenant at will cannot claim adverse possession; suit for possession based on title is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

4 Jan 2023

The present second appeal arises from a suit for permanent injunction and possession filed by the original plaintiffs (now respondents) against the de...

High Court

High Court Quashes Revenue Orders Dismissing Tenancy Application Under Section 70B of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, Due to Lack of Hearing and Misplaced Reliance on Deletion of Section 32(O). The Court Holds That the Application Must Be Decided on Merits Independent of the Deleted Provision, as No Correlation Exists Between Sections 70B and 32(O).

27 Jan 2026

The dispute arose from an application filed under Sections 70B and 70NB of the Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, by the petitioners, cl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over HAMON Mark. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'HAMON' found to be infringed by Defendant's use of 'HAMON COOLING' and 'HCS HAMON COOLING' in trade and corporate name.

6 Jul 2026

The Plaintiff, John Cockerill Hamon SA, filed a Commercial IP Suit alleging infringement and passing off of its registered trademark 'HAMON' by the De...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

2 Jul 2020

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Writ Petition Against Revisional Order of Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction by Revisiting Issues Already Decided by High Court. The Tribunal cannot sit in appeal over High Court judgment and cannot entertain new issues not raised before lower authorities under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

20 Nov 2019

The dispute concerns agricultural lands in Survey No.319/46 and 355/2 in village Khatau, Satara district. The petitioner's forefather was a tenant of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Encroachment Case, Upholding Demolition and Possession Decree. Concurrent findings of ownership and encroachment were not interfered with under Article 136 of the Constitution, and Section 51 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was held inapplicable as the appellant failed to establish being a transferee with bona fide belief.

2 Feb 2023

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the respondent (plaintiff) for possession of land measuring 11 Biswancies and demolition of structur...

High Court

High Court Reconsiders Land Owner's Cross Objection for Enhanced Compensation After Supreme Court Remand. Reconsideration Limited to Valuation of Trees and Classification of Survey No. 336 as Irrigated or Dry Crop Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

21 Apr 2025

The land owner filed a cross objection seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Case No.281/2006. The Re...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)