Search Results for "development agreement termination"

957 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 957 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Finding of Delay and Quantification of Liquidated Damages Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s B.E. Billimoria & Co. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging part of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Leave and License Agreement Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Disputes Justify Appointment, Leaving Issues of Limitation and Validity to Arbitrator.

The applicant, Bafna Motors Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Earlier Refusal to Extend Mandate Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act — Refusal to Extend Mandate Does Not Terminate Arbitral Proceedings or Bar Fresh Appointment Under Section 11.

The case involves a dispute arising out of a Deed of Assignment of Development Rights dated 6 December 2010 between the applicants (Nalin Vallabhbhai ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case Concerning Termination of Temporary Workers. Termination Held Not Retrenchment, Falling Under Section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act as Employment Was Under Fixed-Term Contracts.

The writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution against the Industrial Court's order dated 23.12.1999 which confirmed the Labour Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Awards in Information Technology Upgrade Contract Dispute. Petition Challenges Awards Granting Refund and Rejecting Counter Claims.

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by CMC Limited (original respondent in the arbitration) impugnin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell for Agricultural Land Held Valid and Enforceable Despite Non-Registration of Power of Attorney.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The plaintiff, Hiren Veni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act to Prevent Payment to Contractor Pending Arbitration — Share Subscription Agreement and Concession Agreement Form Composite Transaction

The petitioner, Welspun Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an interim injunc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...