Search Results for "Society Dues"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Society Dues"

975 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 975 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Licence Revocation for Non-Payment of Stallage Charges. Licence Cancellation for Breach of Payment Conditions Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Pay Dues Despite Multiple Notices Under Sections 401, 411, 479 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

11 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Dilip Vasant Shinde, was allotted Shop No.55 in Hirachand Desai Municipal Market, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, in 1988 on a licence issued under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Filed by Cooperative Society Against MHADA and Others — Claims for Conveyance Deed and Challenge to Eviction Found Without Merit. The Court Upholds the Validity of the Lease Deed and Inclusion of Occupants in Slum Redevelopment Scheme Under Slum Act Section 33.

2 Apr 2016

The two writ petitions concerned a property dispute at Pant Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, owned by MHADA. The petitioners, a cooperative housing society a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Validity of Rule 86E of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 in Recovery Proceedings. Court Holds That Rule 86E Is Not Ultra Vires Article 14 as Proceedings Under Section 101 Are Summary and Do Not Require Cross-Examination, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 154 Is Available.

9 Dec 2011

The two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 86E of the Maharas...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Auction Purchaser in SARFAESI Act Case — High Court Erred in Entertaining Writ Petition Despite Alternative Remedy. Restoration of Securitization Application After Full Payment and Sale Certificate Issuance Held Improper.

10 Apr 2024

The appeal arises from an order of the Division Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, which set aside the DRT's order dismi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Notice Against Director in Customs Duty Recovery Case – Recovery Provision Under Section 142 Cannot Be Invoked Against Non-Defaulter. Attachment of Director's Personal Property Set Aside as She Was Not Adjudged Liable Under Customs Act, 1962.

9 Jan 2013

Suman N. Agarwal, a director of Nisum Global Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice of demand dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

22 Jan 2015

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Co-operative Bank Liquidation Case, Holding Priority Over Workmen's Dues Under SARFAESI Act. Section 26E of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 grants overriding priority to secured creditors over all other debts, including statutory dues like provident fund and wages.

20 Nov 2025

The appellant, a secured creditor, had advanced loans to a co-operative sugar factory (the respondent Society). The factory became defunct and default...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Against Former Directors in GST Case — Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed Without Shedding Corporate Veil. Directors Who Resigned Prior to Tax Period Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Dues Under MGST Act, BST Act, and CST Act Without Lifting Corporate Veil.

22 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Mukesh D. Ramani, Satish D. Sanghavi, and Prakash D. Sanghavi, were former directors of Twin City Organics Pvt. Ltd. They filed writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Dispute — Upholds Liability of Guarantor but Sets Aside Interest Rate and Costs. The court held that the arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction by awarding interest at 24% per annum and costs without agreement, but upheld the principal liability under the guarantee.

27 Jan 2017

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification Declaring Company as Relief Undertaking Under Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 — No Violation of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) Found. The notification was issued to protect the company from legal proceedings and to enable its revival, and the court held that the Act does not require prior hearing or publication of reasons.

21 Mar 2012

The petitioners, residents of a housing society and social activists, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)