Search Results for "Security interest"

4159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Condition of Security for Vacating Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit - Cargo Owner Not Liable for Demurrage and Port Charges as They Are Not Party to Contract of Carriage

The appellant, Best Food International Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against an order dated 4th February 2010 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Loan Recovery Suit Based on Written Contracts and TDS Certificate. Loan advanced under written agreements and TDS certificate issued by defendant establishes debt; defendant's defence of no written contract rejected as moonshine.

The plaintiff, Mohandas I. Chatlani, filed a summary suit against the defendant, Varad L. Ullal, for recovery of Rs.72,68,750/- with interest. The sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guarantor's Appeal in Bank Recovery Suit — Guarantee Not Limited to Three Years, Liability Joint and Several. The court held that the guarantor failed to prove the alleged limitation of three years and is jointly and severally liable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The case involves a first appeal filed by Padmakar Krushnarao Bhagwatkar, who was the guarantor/defendant No.2 in a suit filed by the State Bank of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitrator's Interim Order Directing Security in Dredging Contract Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as Arbitrator's Order for Bank Guarantee of Rs. 5,66,30,579/- Upheld Pending Final Award.

The present Commercial Arbitration Petition was filed under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) by Karanja Terminal...