Search Results for "Section 14"

529 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 529 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Property of Partnership Firm Determined as Exclusive Ownership of the Firm under Section 14 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court’s decision that the property was rightly determined to be the exclusive asset of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court – Principles of Natural Justice Violated – Final Assessment Order Rendered Null and Void

Bombay High Court set aside assessment order for non-compliance with statutory provisions under the Income Tax Act, 1961 and violation of principles o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismissed Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Based on Audit Objection Under Income Tax Act, 1961

Change of Opinion – Audit Objection – Reopening of Assessment – Failure to File Timely Reply – Availability of Alternate Remedies – Discreti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Reservation Lapse Under MRTP Act: Supreme Court Declares Land Free After 33 Years of Inaction. Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Do Complete Justice in Land Reservation Case

The Supreme Court held that the reservation of the land had lapsed under both Section 49(7) and Section 127 of the MRTP Act due to the failure of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Conviction in Wife’s Murder Case, Overturns High Court’s Acquittal. Tagline Child Witness’s Testimony Deemed Reliable; Circumstantial Evidence and Accused’s Silence Under Section 106 of Evidence Act Seal Conviction

Child Witness : Competency, Tutoring, Corroboration-The Supreme Court held that the testimony of a child witness is admissible if the child is c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Excess Tax Adjustment and Expedites Disposal of Pending Appeal. Unjustified Delay in Adjudicating Stay Application and Appeal Held Prejudicial to Taxpayer’s Rights

The court deprecated delay of over six years in deciding stay application and appeal.  Held that excess recovery was unjustified and directed refund ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issued Writ of Prohibition Against Proceedings by Non-Financial Institution

Constitution of India, 1950 (COI) – Article 226 and Article 227 – High Court’s writ jurisdiction to issue Writ of Prohibition when there is a cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashed Notice Issued Under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Reassessment Proceedings Deemed Invalid Due to Lack of New Material and Reopening on Same Grounds as Section 263 Proceedings

Reopening of assessment is not permissible when the issues have already been adjudicated in revisional proceedings under Section 263 and no fresh mate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Assessment proceedings cannot be reopened based on change of opinion within 4 years – Notice under Section 148 declared without jurisdiction.

Bombay High Court Quashed Reassessment Notice Issued Under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Declared Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 As Without Jurisdiction – Held That Search-Based Proceedings Should Have Been Initiated Under Section 153C

Search-Based Reassessment – Jurisdictional Defect – Section 153C Overrides Section 147 & Section 148 – Lack Of Independent Material For Reas...