Search Results for "Patent Illegality"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Patent Illegality"

930 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 930 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Upholds Refund of Withheld EPF/ESI Amounts but Remits Liquidated Damages Issue for Reconsideration. The court held that the rejection of liquidated damages claim was patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, while the award of refund of EPF/ESI deductions was not against public policy.

2 Jan 2026

The judgment concerns two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 01.07.2019. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Case Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Award of Rs.1,26,46,303/- with Interest at 12% Per Annum. The court held that the arbitrator had applied his mind and there was no violation of natural justice or public policy.

23 Dec 2025

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Manmohan Bhimsen Goyal and Kavita Manmohan Goyal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Rejecting Contractor's Claims for Railway Maintenance Contract. Court upholds award on grounds of no patent illegality or perversity, finding that the arbitrator's decision was based on proper appreciation of evidence and contractual terms.

8 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Amit Engineers, a government contractor, was awarded a work order by the Central Railway for an annual maintenance contract of RM...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

7 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Illegal Disposal of Seized Gold Jewellery Without Notice and Before Confiscation Order. Customs Authorities Directed to Pay Current Market Value for 1028 Grams of Gold Disposed in Violation of Section 111 of Customs Act, 1962 and Article 300A of Constitution.

21 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Leyla Mohmoodi and Mojtaba Ebrahim Gholami, through their constituted attorney, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Interest on Delayed Payment. The court examined entitlement to interest under Clause 60.8 of the contract and validity of alleged waiver through communications, referencing arbitration provisions and contract law principles.

22 Apr 2021

The dispute arose from a contract awarded by the State of Kerala to the appellants for highway upgradation, executed on 7 November 2002. The appellant...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Acquisition Cases — Non-Grant of Solatium and Interest Upheld. The Court held that Section 3J of the National Highways Act, 1956, excluding solatium and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

3 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), considered the validity of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Television Production Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Reputation. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that claimant failed to prove loss of reputation due to alleged breach of contract.

8 May 2015

The petitioners, Star India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on rate analysis and rejection of counterclaims under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Apr 2015

The Union of India, through the Executive Engineer, CPWD, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging ...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)