Search Results for "Legitimate Expectations"

201 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 201 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Rejection of Technical Bid in Tender for Bus Station Reconstruction Dindori. The petitioner alleges arbitrariness in disqualification for want of signed Geo-tagging certificate despite alleged non-cooperation of authorities.

The High Court of Bombay heard a writ petition filed by M/s. C4 Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013 and engag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against 50% TDR Curtailment for Surrendered Land Under MRTP Act. Held that Development Control Regulations cannot override statutory entitlement under Section 126 of the MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioners, M/s. Aswani Associates and Shri Sandeep Rasiklal Shah, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 17 October 2017 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Safai Kamacharis' Petition Against Arbitrary Termination by Municipal Corporation. Contractual Termination Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.

The petitioners, nineteen individuals, were working as safai kamacharis (sanitation workers) on a contract basis with the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Government Order on Health Department as Arbitrary. The Petitions Invoke Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India to Quash the Order Dated 14.05.2025 for Violation of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights.

The petitioners, including Jagadeesha Moger and others, filed a series of writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Railway Board's Catering Licensing Policy — License Fee and Gross Sales Share Not Arbitrary. The policy requiring licensees to pay a share of gross sales is a valid contractual term and does not violate Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, various catering associations and individual licensees, challenged the Railway Board's policy dated 1st April 2013 and subsequent cir...