Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

331 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 331 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CENVAT Credit for Input Services Used for Storage Tanks Outside Factory in Central Excise Case — Services Used in Relation to Storage of Inputs Eligible for Credit Even if Received Outside Factory Premises.

The appellant, M/s. Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd., is a manufacturer of excisable goods under Chapters 28, 29, and 31 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Limitation Bar Upheld. Show Cause Notice Issued After Six Years Held Time-Barred as Assessee Did Not Suppress Facts.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the order of the Customs, Excise a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears appeal against CESTAT order upholding duty demand and confiscation of diamonds due to shortage and non-compliance with export obligations — substantial questions raised on interpretation of Notification No. 177/94-Cus and para 8.78B of Handbook of Procedures.

The appellant, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold jewellery studded with diamonds at its unit in the Santacruz Electronics...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case Due to Limitation Bar. Demand for Excise Duty on Gates and Hoists Supplied to Irrigation Department Held Time-Barred Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, Water Resources Development (formerly Irrigation Department), was engaged in manufacturing mechanical gates, parts, and hoists for dams...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Department's Appeal in Customs DFIA Scheme Conversion Case. Circular No.36/2010 Held Directory, Not Mandatory, Allowing Amendment of Shipping Bills Beyond Time Limit.

The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Export) against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Valuation Case — Confirms CESTAT's Finding That Transaction Value of Imported Goods Is Acceptable Under Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962. Burden of Proof on Revenue to Show Fraud or Misdeclaration Not Discharged.

The case involves four Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Port-Export), Chennai, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, ...