Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

22521 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22521 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Complainant's Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that the accused failed to rebut the presumption of legally enforceable debt under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Act.

7 Dec 2020

The appellant, Kiran Rameshlal Bhandari, filed two criminal appeals challenging the judgment and order dated 20.02.2017 passed by the learned Judicial...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Rajasthan's Gutka Notification for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that no part of cause of action arose within Karnataka as the notification was issued in Rajasthan, the petitioner resides in Rajasthan, and all respondents are outside Karnataka.

15 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Rahul Joshi, a resident of Jaipur, Rajasthan, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the High Court of Karnataka challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Electricity Board's Petition Challenging Injunction Against Disconnection for Non-Payment of Arrears. Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Used to Restrain Disconnection Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

22 Dec 2006

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (now Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.), challenged an order passed by the Civil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Under Section 394 of Companies Act, 1956 — Restructuring of Casby Group Approved. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from Regional Director.

19 Mar 2015

The judgment concerns a petition filed by Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor) and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Transferee) seeking sanction of a scheme of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Immediate Halt to Stubble Burning and Construction Activities in Delhi-NCR to Combat Air Pollution — Violation of Article 21 Right to Life. The Court held that failure of state governments and local authorities to prevent pollution-causing activities violates the right to life and makes them liable for tortious acts and contempt of court.

4 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court was hearing interlocutory applications in the ongoing M.C. Mehta v. Union of India writ petition concerning environmental pollution,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Reconstruction of Suit Records Without Determining Pendency. Order for Reconstruction of 1969 Suit Records Set Aside as Prothonotary Failed to Verify Pendency and Notice Not Given to Defendants.

13 Jan 2012

A suit was instituted on the Original Side of this Court in 1969 for the redemption of a mortgage executed in 1925. The Defendants were a company owne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Suit — Upholds Refusal to Strike Out Defence Under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC for Failure to File Written Statement Within 90 Days. The court held that the power to strike out defence is discretionary and not automatic, and that non-disclosure of defence under Order 6A Rule 3 CPC does not justify striking out.

21 Dec 2017

The present appeals arise from a suit filed in 1987 by Behram Nowrosji Gamadia and Jehangir Dhan Mistri (original plaintiffs) against several defendan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Reservation in Promotion Policy of Mumbai Port Trust; Office Memorandum Dated 21 January 2002 Under Scrutiny. Petitioners Allege Violation of M. Nagaraj Principles and 100% Reservation for SC/ST in Office Superintendent Cadre.

30 Nov 2016

The writ petition was filed by the Mumbai Port Trust Non SC/ST Employees Association, an association registered under the Trade Unions Act representin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Affirming Removal of Mathadhipathi under A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987. Leave granted in SLP against dismissal of challenge to removal based on enquiry report finding charges proved.

1 Jan 1970

The appeal arose from the removal of the Mathadhipathi of Sri Swamy Hathiramji Mutt, Tirupati, under the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.

28 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...

146 147 148 149 150

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)