Search Results for "registry procedure"

1708 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1708 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Commissioner of Customs Can Disagree with Inquiry Officer's Report Under CHA Licensing Regulations, 2004 — Full Bench resolves conflict on scope of disciplinary authority's power to differ from subordinate officer's findings.

The petitioner, M/s. Delta Logistics, a partnership firm, was a licensed Customs House Agent (CHA) under the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Appeal Against Review Order Permitting Tenant to Amend Written Statement in Rent Suit. Amendment Sought After Trial Decree and After Rejection of Earlier Amendment Application, Not Allowed as It Would Circumvent Finality of Decree.

The case arises from a suit for eviction filed by the landlord (appellants) against the tenant (respondents) for default in payment of rent from April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Cases Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Service of notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 must be proved by the complainant; mere endorsement 'not claimed' is insufficient to establish deemed service.

The petitioner, Sahajanand Investments Pvt. Ltd., filed four criminal writ petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits South African National in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Sealing Procedures. Conviction under Sections 8(c), 21(c), 23, 28, 29 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove contraband was the same as seized.

The appellant, a South African national, was convicted by the Special Judge for NDPS Act cases for offences under Sections 8(c) read with Sections 21(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 19(2) of Bombay Parole and Furlough Rules, 1959 as Unconstitutional — Mandatory One-Year Gap Between Parole Releases Violates Article 14 and 21. Rule 19(2) held arbitrary and irrational for imposing blanket bar without considering individual circumstances.

The petitioner, Kantilal Nandlal Jaiswal, a life convict undergoing sentence for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, along with other ...