Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition as Abuse of Process Where Withdrawal Sought After Full Hearing to Avoid Adverse Order. Court Refuses Permission to Withdraw Petition Filed in 2018 Challenging Execution Proceedings Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, as Petitioners Sought Withdrawal Only After Full Hearing and to Circumvent Impending Adverse Order.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 57
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who were the legal representatives of the original judgment-debtor, filed Writ Petition No.13684 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court challenging the execution proceedings arising from a 1993 award of the Cooperative Court. The award directed the predecessor-in-title of the petitioners to hand over vacant possession of the suit premises to respondent no.1. The award was confirmed by the Cooperative Appellate Court, the High Court in a writ petition, and the Letters Patent Appeal. The award was put into execution in Regular Darkhast No.170 of 1993. The petitioners filed the present writ petition in 2018 challenging the execution proceedings. After the petition was fully heard on merits, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition on instructions. The Court declined the request, noting that the withdrawal was sought only after the conclusion of the hearing and to avoid an impending adverse order. The Court held that permitting withdrawal in such circumstances would amount to an abuse of the process of law and defeat the ends of justice. The Court dismissed the petition with costs of Rs.25,000 to be paid to respondent no.1 within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Withdrawal of Petition - Abuse of Process - Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Court refused permission to withdraw petition where petitioners sought withdrawal only after full hearing and to circumvent an impending adverse order - Held that permitting withdrawal in such circumstances would amount to abuse of process of law and defeat the ends of justice (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a petitioner who has fully argued the petition and seeks withdrawal only after the hearing is concluded and to avoid an impending adverse order should be permitted to withdraw the petition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition dismissed with costs of Rs.25,000 to be paid to respondent no.1 within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of petition after final hearing to avoid adverse order is abuse of process
  • Court may refuse permission to withdraw
  • Inherent power to prevent abuse of process
  • Section 151 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (06) 103

Writ Petition No.13684 of 2018

2019-06-27

Sandeep K. Shinde

Mr. Kishor Patil i/by Ms. Rukmini Khairnar for the Petitioners, Mr. S.S. Patwardhan i/by Mr. Bhooshan R. Mandliki for the Respondent No.1

Manisha Sampatrao Bhosale & Ors.

Balkrishna Shamrao Mhapralkar & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging execution proceedings arising from a cooperative court award.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to withdraw the petition after full hearing to avoid an adverse order.

Filing Reason

Petitioners challenged the execution of a 1993 award directing possession of suit premises.

Previous Decisions

Cooperative Court (1993) passed award directing possession; confirmed by Cooperative Appellate Court, High Court in writ petition, and Letters Patent Appeal.

Issues

Whether withdrawal of petition after final hearing to avoid adverse order is permissible.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners' counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition on instructions. Court declined leave as withdrawal was sought after full hearing and to circumvent impending adverse order.

Ratio Decidendi

A party cannot be permitted to withdraw a petition after full hearing to avoid an impending adverse order, as it would amount to an abuse of the process of law and defeat the ends of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

Leave is declined for the following reasons: Permitting the petitioners to withdraw the petition at this stage would amount to abuse of process of law and defeat the ends of justice.

Procedural History

Cooperative Court passed award in 1993; confirmed by Cooperative Appellate Court, High Court in writ petition, and Letters Patent Appeal. Execution filed as Regular Darkhast No.170 of 1993. Petitioners filed Writ Petition No.13684 of 2018 in 2018 challenging execution. After full hearing, petitioners sought withdrawal; Court declined and dismissed petition with costs.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 151
  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligent Driving by Rickshaw Driver. Deceased's family awarded increased compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition as Abuse of Process Where Withdrawal Sought After Full Hearing to Avoid Adverse Order. Court Refuses Permission to Withdraw Petition Filed in 2018 Challenging Execution Proceedings Under Maharashtra Cooperative So...