Search Results for "Section 164 statement"

1464 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1464 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Relief in Redevelopment Contract Dispute. Non-Cooperating Members of Cooperative Housing Society Face Motion for Injunction and Mandatory Orders.

The plaintiff, a developer, filed suit for specific performance of a redevelopment contract against a cooperative housing society and some of its non-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Tender for Construction of Commercial Complex in Thane. Court holds that no public interest is involved as the petition is filed by business rivals to scuttle a tender process.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR) and three other indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Child Witness. The court held that the sole testimony of a child witness, without corroboration and with material contradictions, was insufficient to convict the accused for murder under Section 302 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Vishnu Dagadu Gaikwad and Balu Vishnu Gaikwad (respondents) for the murder of Ramabai, the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Applicant Not Named in FIR in Murder Case. Applicant Alleged Illegal Detention and Bribe Demand by Investigating Officer Under Section 438 CrPC.

The applicant, Sureshkumar Ishwarlal Chordiya, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking anticipatory ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Pronounces Judgment on Criminal Writ Petition Filed by Sitting MLA to Quash FIR for Alleged Assault, Wrongful Restraint and Criminal Intimidation. Petitioner Contends that Ingredients of Sections 323, 341 and 506 IPC Are Not Made Out and Investigation Is Politically Motivated.

The petitioner, a sitting Member of the Goa Legislative Assembly, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash FIR No. 18/2020 and charge sheet No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Rejecting Setting Aside of Ex-Parte Decree in Encroachment Suit. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Prove Non-Service of Summons and Alleged Collusion, and Application Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC Was Without Substance.

This civil revision application arose from an order rejecting an application to set aside an ex-parte decree in a suit for possession, damages, and ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 452 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sadashiv Basappa Madgyal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for offences under Sections 302, 324 and 452 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder in House Trespass Case — Conviction Based on Testimony of Injured Eyewitnesses and Motive of Theft and Removal from Service.

The appellant, Sadashiv Basappa Madgyal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for offences under Sections 302, 324 and 452 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The High Court of Karnataka Division Bench heard writ appeals against the order of the learned Single Judge in a service matter involving judicial officers. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 27-09-2013 in WP Nos. 41684-691/2012.

These writ appeals, filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, arise from a common order dated 27-09-2013 passed by a learned Single...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sole Negligence of Truck Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs.10,88,944/- with 6% Interest Confirmed as No Contributory Negligence or Breach of Policy Conditions Proved Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 20.11.2002 at around 6:30 p.m. on Patanpura Ridrol road. The deceased, Mukeshbhai Mafatlal Praj...