CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2011
24 Jan 2012The criminal appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 23-2-2010 (or 23-2-2011) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in S...
Search Results for "Three Years"
20811 result(s) found
Found 20811 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Case — Irregular Deposit of Rent Under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Does Not Bar Eviction. Tenant's failure to deposit rent regularly despite court order justified decree for possession.
27 Jun 2024The case involves a dispute between the landlord (respondent) and the tenant (applicant) over eviction from a flat in Mumbai. The landlord filed a sui...
- 818
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. The Court examines the correctness of enhanced compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for land acquired under the MRTP Act.
13 Feb 2018The appeals before the Bombay High Court arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with the Maharashtra Region...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under UAPA and IPC for Alleged CPI (Maoist) Links. The Court Examined Legality of Conviction Under Sections 13, 18, 20, 38, 39 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Read With Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code Based on Seizure of Maoist Literature and Electronic Evidence.
14 Oct 2022The judgment excerpt relates to two criminal appeals before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, arising from a common judgment and order dated ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.
3 Sep 2025The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeals in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Case Due to Department's Acceptance of Same Methodology in Earlier Years and Tribunal's Failure to Follow Co-ordinate Bench Precedent. The court set aside the ITAT order and remanded for fresh consideration, emphasizing the rule of consistency and binding nature of co-ordinate bench decisions under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
28 Jul 2023The appellant, Cummins India Limited, filed three appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 28th September 2022 ...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Reopening Notices Under Ceiling Act Due to Limitation. Additional Commissioner's power under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 must be exercised within three years from the date of the original order; notices issued after 16 years are barred.
7 Mar 2011The petitioner, Balasaheb Bhaurao Muley, a resident of village Irlad, was the original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural L...
- 87
High Court
High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use
21 Jan 2026The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...
- 627
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Disposes of Multiple Criminal Appeals Challenging Conviction and State’s Enhancement Plea in Double Murder Case. Convictions Under Sections 304 Part I, 147, 148, 149 IPC Arising from Land Boundary Dispute Are Examined and Partly Allowed.
1 Sep 2010The High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, delivered a common oral judgment disposing of four criminal appeals: three filed by convi...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Lavasa Corporation's Second Appeals Against RERA Orders, Holding That RERA Has No Jurisdiction Over Complaints Filed Before Its Establishment. The Court ruled that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority cannot entertain complaints regarding agreements executed prior to the commencement of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
7 Aug 2018The judgment involves three second appeals filed by Lavasa Corporation Limited against orders of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the A...
- 84
