Search Results for "Division Bench orders"

10582 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10582 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Back Wages to Employee Acquitted in Corruption Case — Denial Must Be Reasoned. Reinstatement After Acquittal Does Not Automatically Entitle Back Wages; Employer Must Consider Nature of Acquittal and Conduct Under Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Ramchandra Bapusaheb Desai, was employed as a Junior Engineer with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Parole to Life Convict Under TADA Act Despite Adverse Police Report. Long Incarceration and Good Conduct Outweigh Vague Police Objections for Parole on Ground of Mother's Ailment.

The petitioner, Niyaz Ahmed Shaikh, a life convict under Section 3(3) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA Act) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to University's Refusal for Permanent Approval of Lecturers. Legal Question Involves NET/SET Exemption for M.Phil Holders Under UGC Regulations.

The Writ Petition No. 5336 of 2012 was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, by three lecturers—Ram Raosaheb Pha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Competing Kerosene Dealer for Lack of Locus Standi. Mere Competitor Not a Person Aggrieved Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The appellant, Rajendra Agrawal, a semi-wholesale kerosene dealer in Murtizapur, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of a Single Judge dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reviews Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Thakur Scheduled Tribe Claim. Affinity Test and Blood Relatives' Validity Certificates Central to Challenge Under Article 226.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 10 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Chancellor's Refusal to Intervene in University Appointment. Chancellor's Power Under Section 76(7) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 is Administrative, Not Quasi-Judicial, Hence Writ Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Mrs. Vandana Khedikar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order/communication dated 1...