Search Results for "Dispute Application"

19737 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19737 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Promoter in Co-operative Dispute Under Section 94(3)(c) MCS Act. Co-operative Court's Power to Implead Parties Is Not Restricted to Persons Enumerated Under Section 91(1)(a) to (e) and Includes Necessary Parties for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioners, members of Bramha Suncity Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed Dispute No.106/2021 before the Co-operative Court under the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Alleging Res Judicata and Patent Illegality; Decision on Coercion and Interest Awaited.

The petition challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner, a multi-state co-operative b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order in Land Area Correction Dispute — Remands for Fresh Consideration Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's challenge to area correction based on 2018 report succeeds as Minister failed to consider 2010 report and denied opportunity to cross-examine.

The petitioner, Rolland Stanislaus Britto, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21 June 2021 passed by the Minister-Revenue, Maharashtra, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where findings are based on appreciation of evidence and no perversity is shown.

The judgment pertains to two second appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a property dispute. The appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Witness and Additional Documents in Commercial Suit — Upholds Liberal Approach Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. Party Seeking to Place on Record E-Mails and Recall PW-1 for Cross-Examination Must Be Permitted to Ensure Fair Trial and Effective Adjudication.

The dispute arose from a Professional Services Agreement dated 19th February 2013 between M/s. Levitate Mobile Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (LMT), the appel...