Bombay High Court Considered Promoter's Second Appeals Against Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal Orders on Interest Compensation and Dismissal Under RERA Pre-Deposit. The Court examined whether delays attributed to no objection certificates and occupation certificates can be blamed on the promoter, whether allottees' approval of possession date extension waives interest, and whether interest can be retrospective under Section 4(2)(c) read with Rule 4 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter concerned multiple second appeals filed by M/s Man Global Ltd. Mumbai, a real estate promoter, before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging orders of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The appeals fell into two groups. The first group of 18 second appeals challenged orders dated 10 June 2022 in sixteen appeals and 10 December 2022 in two appeals, by which the Appellate Tribunal had awarded interest to the respondent allottees for delay in handing over possession of apartments. The second group of 22 second appeals challenged an order dated 7 July 2021 by which the Appellate Tribunal dismissed appeals filed by the promoter for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the Act. The High Court heard the matters together on 10 July 2023. The appellant promoter was represented by senior counsel and other advocates, while the respondent allottees were represented by multiple counsel, with one respondent appearing in person. The appellant raised three substantial questions of law in the first group: whether delay caused by delays in obtaining No Objection Certificate and Occupation Certificate from the Municipal Corporation could be attributed to the promoter; whether allottees who approved extension of the date for handing over possession continued to be entitled to interest; and whether, for an ongoing project, the period of interest awarded could be retrospective to the date of registration and the new date of completion as per the declaration under Section 4(2)(c) read with Rule 4 of the RERA Act. In support, the appellant submitted that the project was a Rental Housing Scheme requiring permissions from two planning authorities, Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority and Mira Bhaindar Municipal Corporation, and that delay occurred due to reasons beyond the promoter's reasonable control. The court recorded these submissions and the procedural background, but the provided judgment excerpt ends before the final analysis and operative decision. Therefore, the final ruling on the substantial questions of law and the validity of the impugned tribunal orders is not available in the text.

Headnote

A) Real Estate Law - Delay in Delivery of Possession - Attribution of Delay for No Objection Certificate and Occupation Certificate - Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Section 4(2)(c) and Rule 4 - The appellant promoter raised a substantial question whether delay in handing over possession due to delays in receiving No Objection Certificate and Occupation Certificate from the Municipal Corporation could be attributed to it, given settled law that absence of Occupation Certificate makes handing over possession impermissible; the court heard submissions on this issue but the provided judgment excerpt does not contain final determination (Paras 5-6).

B) Real Estate Law - Interest on Delayed Possession - Effect of Allottee's Approval of Extension - Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - The appellant questioned whether allottees who approved extension of the date for handing over possession continue to remain entitled to claim interest; this substantial question of law was raised and argued before the High Court, but no final decision appears in the excerpt (Paras 5-6).

C) Real Estate Law - Retrospective Interest on Ongoing Projects - Date of Registration and Completion under Statutory Declaration - Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Section 4(2)(c) read with Rule 4 - The court considered whether, in respect of an ongoing project, the period of interest awarded could be retrospective to the date of registration and the new date of completion of the project as per declaration required to be made under section 4(2)(c) read with Rule 4 of RERA; the issue was raised as a substantial question of law and argued, but no final ruling is available in the provided text (Paras 5-6).

D) Real Estate Law - Appellate Pre-Deposit Requirement - Dismissal for Non-Compliance - Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Section 43(5) - In a separate group of 22 second appeals, the appellant challenged orders of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dated 7 July 2021 dismissing appeals for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of RERA; the High Court heard submissions from both sides on this issue, but the final decision is not included in the excerpt (Paras 2, 4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether delay in handing over possession due to delays in receiving No Objection Certificate and Occupation Certificate from the Municipal Corporation can be attributed to the promoter; whether allottees who approved extension of the date for handing over possession continue to be entitled to interest; whether interest for an ongoing project can be awarded retrospectively to the date of registration and the new date of completion under Section 4(2)(c) read with Rule 4 of RERA; and whether dismissal of appeals by the Appellate Tribunal for non-compliance of Section 43(5) RERA is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (07) 89

Second Appeal No.108 of 2023 along with connected Second Appeals and interim applications

2023-07-10

Madhav J. Jamdar, J.

2023:BHC-AS:35226

Mr. Vineet Naik, Senior Advocate; Mr. Vinod G. Talreja; Avinash Undhare; Gobindram D. Talreja; Mr. Naresh Pai; Ms. Rupali Padgulekar; Mr. Arun Panickar; Mr. Vinay Nair; Mr. Sanjay Chaturvedi; Ms. Pooja Gaikwad; Mr. Nikhil Waje; Mr. Gaurav Beri; Ms. Sana Subedar; Jayesh S. Sapra; Mr. Chandrakant Sutrave (Respondent No.2 in person)

M/s Man Global Ltd. Mumbai

Mr. Jitendra Jain, Dr. Alok Chaturvedi, Azam Wahid Qureshi, Meenal Parab, Nikhil K. Kathane, Tilkesh Soni, Anthony D'Souza & Anr., Monali C Sutrave & Anr., Amreen Bhimani, Brijesh Kumar Mathur, Rakesh Hiralal Parmar & Anr., Simin Mohd. Arif, Umesh Ved, Vikas Khanna & Anr., Shivnath Gunda, Rakesh Kumar Jha, Gaurav Kumar, Neha Chaube, Shyampyari Yadav, and other allottees

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second Appeals before the High Court challenging orders of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal in proceedings under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

Remedy Sought

The appellant promoter sought to set aside appellate tribunal orders awarding interest to allottees for delayed possession and orders dismissing its appeals for non-compliance with Section 43(5) RERA.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the appellate tribunal's orders: first group awarding interest to allottees for delay in handing over possession and second group dismissing promoter's appeals for failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of RERA.

Previous Decisions

Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal passed orders on 10 June 2022 (16 appeals) and 10 December 2022 (2 appeals) awarding interest to allottees, and an order on 7 July 2021 dismissing promoter's appeals for non-compliance with Section 43(5) of RERA.

Issues

Whether delay in handing over possession due to delays in obtaining No Objection Certificate and Occupation Certificate from the Municipal Corporation can be attributed to the appellant promoter Whether allottees who approved extension of the date for handing over possession continue to be entitled to claim interest Whether in respect of an ongoing project the period of interest awarded can be retrospective to the date of registration and the new date of completion of the project as per declaration under Section 4(2)(c) read with Rule 4 of the RERA Act Whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in dismissing the promoter's appeals for non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the RERA Act

Submissions/Arguments

The project was a Rental Housing Scheme requiring permissions from two planning authorities, Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority and Mira Bhaindar Municipal Corporation The project delay was due to reasons beyond the appellant's reasonable control, evidenced by correspondence with the authorities The absence of a No Objection Certificate or Occupation Certificate from the Municipal Corporation made handing over possession impermissible, so delay could not be attributed to the appellant Allottees' approval of extension of the date for handing over possession should disentitle them from claiming interest Interest could not be awarded retrospectively for an ongoing project to the date of registration and new completion date under Section 4(2)(c) read with Rule 4 of RERA

Judgment Excerpts

In a group of 18 Second Appeals, the challenge is to the legality and validity of Orders dated 10th June 2022 in 16 Appeals and 10th December 2022 in 2 Appeals passed by the learned Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai. The learned Appellate Tribunal passed the impugned order in the Appeals filed by the Respondents-Allottees awarding interest for delay in handing over possession by the Appellant-Promoter of the apartments to the respective Respondents-Allottees. In another group of 22 Second Appeals, the challenge is to the legality and validity of Order dated 7th July 2021 by which the Appeals filed before the learned Appellate Tribunal by the Appellant-Promoter were dismissed for non-compliance of Section 43(5) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

Procedural History

The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal passed orders on 7 July 2021 dismissing the promoter's appeals for non-compliance with Section 43(5) RERA in 22 matters; on 10 June 2022 (16 appeals) and 10 December 2022 (2 appeals) it allowed allottees' appeals and awarded interest for delayed possession. Aggrieved by these orders, the appellant promoter filed multiple Second Appeals before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, which were heard together on 10 July 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016: Section 43(5), Section 4(2)(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considered Promoter's Second Appeals Against Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal Orders on Interest Compensation and Dismissal Under RERA Pre-Deposit. The Court examined whether delays attributed to no objection certificates ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Cruelty and Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Multiple and Inconsistent Dying Declarations, Possibility of Tutoring, and Failure to Prove Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Led to Acquit...