Search Results for "voting majority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "voting majority"

354 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 354 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in No-Confidence Motion for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. Failure to Provide Three Days' Notice to Sarpanch Renders No-Confidence Motion Invalid.

22 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. She was removed from the post by a no-confi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chairman's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Agriculture Produce Market Committee Case — Notice of Motion Held Valid Despite Absence of Some Directors' Signatures. Court Declines to Interfere with Statutory Proceedings Under Section 14(4) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Directs Petitioner to Raise Objections Before Presiding Officer.

12 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, was the Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol. He filed a writ petition challenging the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Order in Insolvency Resolution Plan Approval Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Resolution Plan Found Compliant with Section 30(2) and Binding on All Stakeholders Despite Pending Creditor Claim Challenges.

10 Aug 2021

The appeal arose under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against a judgment dated 4 January 2021 of the National Company Law App...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Meeting Rules Apply to No Confidence Motion Meetings Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; No Fresh Meeting Can Be Convened After Expiry of Seven Days on Basis of Illegal Motion. The court ruled that Rule 17 of the Meeting Rules applies to no confidence meetings and that under Section 35(3-B), no direction can be given for a fresh meeting after seven days on an illegal motion.

21 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court addressed two questions of law referred to it concerning the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The first question was whether...

High Court

Bombay High Court: Cooperative Housing Society Cannot Expel Members for Filing Genuine Complaints | Section 35 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Explained

11 Feb 2026

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by five members of a cooperative housing society challenging their expulsion from the society's me...

High Court

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal Upholding Registrar's Approval of Bye-law Amendment with Modification. Held, Registrar Could Modify Number of Directors from 17 to 16 Under Section 13 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, Consistent with Public Policy.

8 Jun 2015

The appeal arose out of a dispute concerning the amendment of bye-laws of a specified co-operative society, the Yeotmal District Central Co-operative ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order and Remands Dispute in No-Confidence Motion Against Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Proper service of notice on all panchayat members is mandatory, and disputed duty of service necessitated fresh inquiry to determine if actual or alternate service was effected as per Bombay Village Panchayats Sarpanch and Upasarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975.

23 Sep 2016

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion passed against the Upa-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Belgaon Tarale, Taluka Igatpuri, District Nashik. The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Promoter's Resolution Plan in IBC Case, Upholds CoC Approval Despite Pending Third-Party Applications. The Court held that the Resolution Professional's Letter of Intent was not conditional and that the Adjudicating Authority's approval of the plan was valid under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

1 Jan 2026

The present appeals arise from a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) concerning M/s. Oracle Home Textiles Limited, initiated on 9th August ...

High Court

Writ Petitions Against Delimitation of Wards in Mysuru and Tumakuru City Corporations Heard by High Court. Petitioners claimed violation of Section 21 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 and non-compliance with delimitation guidelines.

9 Aug 2018

The judgment dealt with a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the delimitation of wards...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch and Upsarpanch in No-Confidence Motion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 17. Failure to Move Motion as Mandated Renders Subsequent Notice Invalid Under Section 35(3A) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

26 Feb 2014

The petitioners, Ravindra Sukhdeo Sanap (Sarpanch) and Vishnu Eknath Nagare (Upsarpanch) of Gram Panchayat Andhera, challenged a notice dated 07.12.20...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)