Writ Petitions Against Delimitation of Wards in Mysuru and Tumakuru City Corporations Heard by High Court. Petitioners claimed violation of Section 21 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 and non-compliance with delimitation guidelines.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment dealt with a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the delimitation of wards in Mysuru City Corporation and Tumakuru City Municipal Corporation. The petitioners, residents of the respective cities, sought to quash notifications dated 23.04.2018 (for Mysuru) and 28.12.2017 (for Tumakuru) issued by the State Government, which declared 65 and 35 wards respectively based on the 2011 census. They argued that the delimitation exercise was not conducted in conformity with Section 21 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, and Government guidelines, particularly Guidelines 9 and 15, which required wards to be geographically compact and regard physical features, communication facilities, and public convenience. Some petitioners also contended that rules under Section 21(3) had not been framed, rendering the delimitation void, and that certain layouts handed over by the Mysuru Urban Development Authority were excluded from ward allocation. Objections filed against the draft notifications were allegedly not properly considered. The State Election Commission had filed a public interest litigation seeking issuance of a final notification. The court heard the matters and reserved its order. The excerpt provided ends before the court’s reasoning and final decision; thus the legal conclusions and operative directions are not available in the given text.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delimitation notifications issued under Section 21 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 are valid and in accordance with applicable guidelines

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (08) 27

Writ Petition Nos. 30543-30545/2018 c/w 29858-29862/2018, 31438-31442/2018, 32989/2018 & 32990-32991/2018, 33432-33435/2018

2018-08-09

B. Veerappa

D.N. Nanjunda Reddy, Jayakumar S. Patil, V.R. Sarathy, Amruth Chowdhary S. for petitioners; Uday Holla, Prathima Honnapura, M.P. Geetha Devi, M.C. Jayakeerthi, R. Subramanya, T.P. Vivekananda for respondents

Shiva Madhu and Others, B.S. Nagesh and Others, Sandeep K and Others, J. Jayanth and Others, R. Lingappa and Others

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 challenging the validity of delimitation notifications issued for Mysuru City Corporation and Tumakuru City Corporation.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the delimitation notifications and direction to carry out fresh delimitation in compliance with the Act and guidelines.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that the delimitation was not in conformity with Section 21 of the KMC Act and Government guidelines; that rules under Section 21(3) were not framed; and that certain layouts were excluded.

Issues

Whether the delimitation notifications dated 23.04.2018 (Mysuru) and 28.12.2017 (Tumakuru) are valid and in compliance with Section 21 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. Whether the State Government was required to frame rules under Section 21(3) before carrying out delimitation. Whether the delimitation properly considered the guidelines regarding geographic compactness, physical features, and public convenience. Whether the exclusion of certain layouts handed over by MUDA from the delimitation violated Section 21 of the Act.

Submissions/Arguments

The delimitation was not in conformity with Guidelines 9 and 15 issued by the Government. Rules under Section 21(3) of the KMC Act were not framed, rendering the delimitation void. The layouts handed over by MUDA were not included in the delimitation, affecting voter rights. Objections filed by the petitioners were not properly considered by the authorities.

Judgment Excerpts

Guideline No.9 clearly and categorically states that all wards shall, as far as practicable, be geographically compact areas, and in delimiting them regard shall be had to the physical features, facilities of communication and public convenience. The petitioners in these writ petitions are challenging different notifications of delimitation of wards issued by the State Government on the basis of 2011 census figures in respect of Mysuru City and Tumakuru City Municipal Corporations, declaring 65 wards at Mysuru and 35 wards at Tumakuru.

Procedural History

Writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution; heard and reserved for order; judgment pronounced on 2018-08-09 by Justice B. Veerappa.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976: 21, 21(2), 21(3)
  • Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964: 13, 352(2)
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Writ Petitions Against Delimitation of Wards in Mysuru and Tumakuru City Corporations Heard by High Court. Petitioners claimed violation of Section 21 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 and non-compliance with delimitation guidelines.
Related Judgement
High Court KAHC010159832015_1