Search Results for "subsisting licence"

274 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Amendment of Plaint to Implead Subsequent Purchaser in Specific Performance Suit. Subsequent Purchaser Claiming Under Vendor is a Necessary Party and No Prejudice is Caused by Impleadment.

The appeal arose from an order of a Learned Single Judge allowing a Chamber Summons for amendment of the plaint in a suit for specific performance. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decrees Ownership of 800 ITC Shares to Plaintiffs, Finding Transfers Forged and Broker's Claim Unproven. Defendant No.14 Failed to Discharge Burden Under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and Forged Transfer Deeds Are Void; Register of Members Ordered to Be Rectified.

The suit concerned a declaration of ownership and rectification of the register of members of ITC Ltd. (Defendant No.1) in respect of 800 shares. Plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Borrower's Waiver Challenge and ARCL's Interest Inclusion Petitions in SARFAESI Appeal Pre-Deposit Dispute. The Court reduced pre-deposit from 50% to 25% of debt due including interest, balancing the borrower's right to appeal and the secured creditor's interests.

The case involves cross-petitions arising from a common DRAT order dated 04 June 2024. The borrower, M/s Royal Traders, challenged the DRAT's refusal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Refer Dispute to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Joint Venture Agreements Not Signed by Appellant, No Arbitration Agreement Between Parties.

The appeal arose from an order dated 8 April 2004 passed by the learned trial Judge dismissing Notice of Motion No. 778 of 2004, which was an applicat...