Search Results for "quasi-judicial authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "quasi-judicial authority"

150 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expulsion on 18.6.2004.

26 Oct 2021

The dispute originated from a partnership firm, M/s Selwel Combines, reconstituted in 1992 with plaintiff No.1 inducted as a partner under a deed stip...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Application Seeking Scrapping of Inquiry Commission in Vikas Dubey Encounter Case — Allegations of Bias Based on Newspaper Reports Rejected as Lacking Evidentiary Value

19 Aug 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition filed by Ghanshyam Upadhyay, the petitioner in a pending writ petition (W.P. (Crl.) No. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Electricity Bill Based on Contract Demand Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Consumer Liable for Minimum Charges Even Without Actual Consumption. The court held that the consumer cannot unilaterally reduce contract demand and must pay minimum charges as per tariff, and Section 126 assessment for unauthorized use is not applicable when billing is based on contract demand.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Vinay Tilokchand Karnavat, a medical practitioner running a hospital in Sillod, Aurangabad, filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Forest Officers for Non-Compliance of Commissioner's Order Under Disabilities Act. Commissioner Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 Not a 'Court' for Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

12 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Ku. Asha d/o Tribhuvan Dongare, was appointed as a Forest Guard in the Forest Department of Maharashtra on a post reserved for handica...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher's Petition for Enforcement of Appointment Order and Allows Management's Petition to Quash Grievance Committee Order — Appointment of Teacher Without Prior Approval from Education Officer Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

26 Mar 2015

The judgment involves two connected writ petitions. Writ Petition No. 493 of 2014 was filed by Yogesh Vitthal Dane, a teacher, seeking enforcement of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Return of Section 34 Application for Lack of Jurisdiction. Court Holds That Under Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Jurisdiction Lies With the Court Where Arbitration Is Conducted, Not Where the Petitioner Resides.

12 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Ravindra Balaji Govindwar, challenged an arbitral award dated 21.12.2013 passed by the arbitrator (respondent no. 6) in proceeding...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interim Order in Coal Transport Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's findings on committee report and weighment system held to be interim and not subject to writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

26 Aug 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Sanwal Coal Carriers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with Western Coalfields Limited (respondents) for driving pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Return of Security Deposit with Interest in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.10 Crores with 18% Interest After CESTAT Set Aside Confiscation Order. The Court held that once proceedings are finalized in favour of the importer, the revenue cannot retain the security deposit and must return it with interest from the date of deposit under the Customs Act, 1962.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, M/s Pride Foramer, a company engaged in offshore oil exploration, imported a rig 'Pride Pensylvania' for a contract with ONGC. On 15 M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Alleging Misuse of Public Funds by Educational Trust and Trustees — No Prima Facie Case of Mala Fides or Violation of Government Resolutions Established. The court held that the petitioner failed to provide specific evidence of diversion of fees or misappropriation, and the trust had complied with the fee regulation committee's directions under the Government Resolution dated 24-09-2003.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Shri Balasaheb Baburao Jambulkar, an ex-freedom fighter and social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 ...

12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)