Search Results for "process server"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "process server"

149 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Ex Parte Decree in Partition Suit Due to Procedural Irregularities in Service of Summons. Failure to Affix Summons on Court Building and Lack of Proper Service Affidavit Renders Ex Parte Decree Unsustainable Under Order V Rule 17 and Order IX Rule 6 CPC.

18 Mar 2024

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an ex parte decree passed in a partition suit (O...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Recovery of Money — Sets Aside Order Rejecting Application Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons Properly and Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings Constitute Sufficient Cause for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

29 Nov 2024

The appellant, Shri K. Raja, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an order d...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Recovery Suit — Sets Aside Order Rejecting Application Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons Properly and Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings Constitute Sufficient Cause for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

29 Nov 2024

The appellant, Shri K. Raja, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Non-Certification of Annexures to Return of Allotment Under Section 39(5) of Companies Act, 2013 — Default Under Section 39(4) Relates Only to Filing of Return, Not Certification of Annexures.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioners, N.S.J.L Nidhi Ltd and its officers, challenged an order dated October 11, 2023, by which a Learned Adjudicating Officer imposed a pen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Registration Act Case — Failure to Prove Willful Refusal to Register Document. Conviction under Section 82 of Registration Act, 1908 set aside as prosecution failed to establish that accused intentionally refused to appear before Sub-Registrar despite valid summons.

19 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Pushpavalli, was convicted by the trial court (IX Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru) in C.C. No. 28802/2005 for an offenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes State Order Demanding 100% Ready Reckoner Valuation for Regularisation of Change of User in Land Conveyance Case. Court holds that premium for regularisation of non-agricultural use and conveyance must be calculated based on the policy in force at the time of application, not subsequent higher rates.

8 Jun 2026

The petitioner, M/s. M.P. Homes, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11.11.2020 passed by the State of Maharashtra (Respondent No.1) dire...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Charge Framing Against Accused in Sexual Assault Case — CCTV Footage Not Sufficient to Dislodge Prima Facie Case Under Sections 354, 376 IPC. The court held that at the stage of framing charge, the court need only see if there is sufficient ground to proceed, and the victim's statement provides prima facie material for charges under Sections 354, 354A, 354B, 341, 342, 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(k) IPC.

20 Dec 2017

The applicant, Tarun Jit Tejpal, filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Want of Prosecution Due to Non-Service of Defendants — Court Holds That Dismissal Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC Requires Willful Default or Negligence, Not Mere Failure to Serve. The court restored the suit, emphasizing that the plaintiffs had made efforts to serve the defendants and had filed a Chamber Summons for substituted service, which was pending.

29 Jan 2018

The appellants, M/s. Jain Developers and others, filed Suit No. 2808 of 2008 in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that there was a valid and...

High Court

Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition on Agreeable Terms in Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Challenge — Petitioner's Grievance Redressed by Revenue's Undertaking to Consider Representation

21 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Srinivasan Jayaprakasam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging...

12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)